Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The current volume of the Forschungen in Ephesos presents the concluding results of the recent archaeological and art-hisorical investigations at the monumental tomb in the hinterland of Ephesos. The date of the Mausoleum can be fixed accumulative between 310 and 280/70 BC and following the interpretation of references regarding the monument`s dedication and the sources for the historical events Antigonos I. Monophthalmos is recognised as the newly identified personality to whom the Mausoleum belonged.

Sarcophagi --- Tombs --- Antiquities --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- Turkey --- Mausoleums --- Sculpture, Ancient --- Sepulchral monuments --- Pottery, Ancient --- Mausolées --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Sculpture antique --- Monuments funéraires --- Céramique antique --- Ephesus (Extinct city) --- Ephèse (Ville ancienne) --- Archaeology --- Monumental tomb --- heroa --- archaeological investigation --- material evidence --- late Classical/early Hellenistic sculpture --- funerary and ruler cult --- Greece --- Asia Minor --- Ephesus --- monumentaler Grabbau --- Heroa --- archäologische Untersuchung --- materielle Evidenz --- spätklassisch-frühhellenistische Skulptur --- Grab- und Herrscherkult --- Greichenland --- Kleinasien --- Ephesos --- Amphore --- Keramik --- Relief

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In the last decades, historians and art historians have created an active historiographical debate about one of the most fascinating and studied iconographic themes of the Middle Ages: the royal divine coronation. Indeed, in the specific case of some Ottonian and Salian illuminations, it has been proposed that their function was not only political or to legitimize power, as traditionally suggested (Herrscherbilder), but also liturgical and religious (Memorialbilder). This has led to a complete rethinking of the meaning of this iconographic theme: the divine coronation of the king would not symbolically allude to his earthly power but to the wholly devotional hope of receiving the crown of eternal life in the afterlife. If this academic debate has been concentrated, above all, on Ottonian and Salian royal images, this Special Issue of Arts would like to deal with this topic by stimulating the analysis of royal divine coronation and blessing scenes in religious and liturgical context (mosaics, frescos, or paintings placed in cathedrals or monastic churches and illuminations of liturgical texts) with a wider geographical and temporal setting; that is, the European and Mediterranean kingdoms in the period from the 12th to the 15th centuries.

royal divine coronation --- royal iconography --- royal sacrality --- power-religion relationship --- medieval kingship --- angelology --- angels --- Angelus Domini --- angelic coronation --- St Stephen I of Hungary --- St Ladislaus I of Hungary --- Matthias Corvinus --- Chronici Hungarici compositio saeculi XIV --- Hartvik Legend --- Luigi Lippomano --- apocalyptic visions --- prophetism --- messianism --- Crown of Aragon --- Germanias revolt --- coronation --- laicization --- sacralization --- rex et sacerdos --- iconography --- Portuguese kings --- tomb sculpture --- statues --- regaliae --- cathedral --- Abbey of Saint-Denis --- festival crowing --- Abbot Suger (1122–1151) --- consecration

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The international controversy over who "owns" antiquities has pitted museums against archaeologists and source countries where ancient artifacts are found. In his book Who Owns Antiquity?, James Cuno argued that antiquities are the cultural property of humankind, not of the countries that lay exclusive claim to them. Now in Whose Culture?, Cuno assembles preeminent museum directors, curators, and scholars to explain for themselves what's at stake in this struggle--and why the museums' critics couldn't be more wrong. Source countries and archaeologists favor tough cultural property laws restricting the export of antiquities, have fought for the return of artifacts from museums worldwide, and claim the acquisition of undocumented antiquities encourages looting of archaeological sites. In Whose Culture?, leading figures from universities and museums in the United States and Britain argue that modern nation-states have at best a dubious connection with the ancient cultures they claim to represent, and that archaeology has been misused by nationalistic identity politics. They explain why exhibition is essential to responsible acquisitions, why our shared art heritage trumps nationalist agendas, why restrictive cultural property laws put antiquities at risk from unstable governments--and more. Defending the principles of art as the legacy of all humankind and museums as instruments of inquiry and tolerance, Whose Culture? brings reasoned argument to an issue that for too long has been distorted by politics and emotionalism. In addition to the editor, the contributors are Kwame Anthony Appiah, Sir John Boardman, Michael F. Brown, Derek Gillman, Neil MacGregor, John Henry Merryman, Philippe de Montebello, David I. Owen, and James C. Y. Watt.

Antiquities -- Collection and preservation -- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Antiquities -- Collection and preservation -- Social aspects. --- Cultural property -- Protection. --- Cultural property -- Repatriation. --- Excavations (Archaeology) -- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Museum exhibits -- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Museums -- Acquisitions -- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Museums -- Philosophy. --- Museums --- Museum exhibits --- Cultural property --- Antiquities --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- General --- Museum Publications --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Acquisitions --- Protection --- Repatriation --- Collection and preservation --- Social aspects --- Philosophy --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Social aspects. --- Protection. --- Repatriation. --- Philosophy. --- Display techniques --- Displays, Museum --- Museum displays --- Archaeological digs --- Archaeological excavations --- Digs (Archaeology) --- Excavation sites (Archaeology) --- Ruins --- Sites, Excavation (Archaeology) --- Repatriation of cultural property --- Cultural property, Protection of --- Cultural resources management --- Archaeological specimens --- Artefacts (Antiquities) --- Artifacts (Antiquities) --- Specimens, Archaeological --- Exhibitions --- Government policy --- Law and legislation --- Restitution --- Public institutions --- Cabinets of curiosities --- Museum techniques --- Archaeology --- Cultural policy --- Historic preservation --- Material culture --- 037 --- 069.01 --- 7.025.7 --- 7.025.7 Kunstwerken: verlies, teloorgang door o.a. diefstal of tijdens transport --- Kunstwerken: verlies, teloorgang door o.a. diefstal of tijdens transport --- 069.01 Museologie --- Museologie --- Collection and preservation&delete& --- Acquisitions&delete& --- musea --- Musées --- Objets exposés --- Biens culturels --- Antiquités --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Aspect moral --- Collections et conservation --- Aspect social --- Philosophie --- Accessibility. --- American Journal of Archaeology. --- American Schools of Oriental Research. --- Ancient Egypt. --- Ancient Greece. --- Ancient Greek art. --- Antiquities. --- Archaeological context. --- Archaeological site. --- Archaeology. --- Art Loss Register. --- Art museum. --- Arts and Crafts movement. --- Beijing. --- Benin. --- Burial. --- Cambridge University Press. --- Capital Museum. --- Censorship. --- Circumstantial evidence. --- Civilization. --- Collecting. --- Colonialism. --- Consideration. --- Cosmopolitanism. --- Country of origin. --- Crime. --- Criticism. --- Cultural Property (Japan). --- Cultural appropriation. --- Cultural heritage. --- Cultural nationalism. --- Cultural property law. --- Cultural property. --- Curator. --- Elgin Marbles. --- Epigraphy. --- Euphronios Krater. --- Fu Hao. --- Funding. --- Iconoclasm. --- Ideology. --- Indigenous peoples. --- Insider. --- Institution. --- Intellectual property. --- International Council of Museums. --- J. Paul Getty Museum. --- Jews. --- Kenya. --- Kwame Anthony Appiah. --- Lansdowne portrait. --- Lecture. --- Legislation. --- Literature. --- Looting. --- Material culture. --- Matthew Bogdanos. --- Member state. --- Metropolitan Museum of Art. --- Museum. --- National Museum of the American Indian. --- National Palace Museum. --- National Treasure (Japan). --- National treasure. --- Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. --- Neolithic. --- Newspaper. --- Ownership. --- Partage. --- Personhood. --- Philistinism. --- Private collection. --- Provenance. --- Publication. --- Punitive expedition. --- Repatriation (humans). --- Rhetoric. --- Roman art. --- Ruler. --- Smithsonian Institution. --- Smuggling. --- Sophistication. --- State ownership. --- Statute. --- Superiority (short story). --- Taliban. --- Tax. --- The Hundreds. --- The New York Review of Books. --- The New York Times. --- Theft. --- Tomb of Fu Hao. --- Tomb. --- Treaty. --- Tribal art. --- UNESCO. --- Urkesh. --- Work of art. --- World Heritage Site.