Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Does U.S. assistance to the security forces of repressive states improve the effectiveness of internal security forces in countering security threats? Does it improve the accountability and human rights records of these forces? This book addresses these questions by examining the results of U.
Military assistance, American. --- Security Assistance Program. --- Security Assistance Program --- Military assistance, American --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- American military assistance --- Economic assistance, American --- Security, International
Choose an application
This report explores the nature of the risks inherent in U.S. security sector assistance to the fragile states of Africa and how the United States might better anticipate and mitigate these risks. It examines these issues through a review of qualitative and quantitative literature from both the academic and policy fields and through interviews conducted throughout the agencies of the U.S. government. The quantitative literature suggests a stark dilemma for those responsible for U.S. security sector assistance to the AFRICOM area of responsibility: The countries that are most in need of assistance are usually the ones least able to make positive use of it. Case studies of security sector assistance in the fragile countries in Africa are used to trace multiple specific pathways by which such assistance can have negative second- and third-order effects. Finally, the report provides numerous recommendations about ways in which the United States can improve the processes by which it monitors and evaluates, plans, and implements security sector assistance in the fragile states of Africa and more generally.
Military assistance, American --- Security sector --- Political stability --- Conflict management --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Risk assessment --- Homeland security sector --- Internal security sector --- National security sector --- American military assistance --- Public administration
Choose an application
The United States faces a unique set of challenges and opportunities in strengthening security and justice sector partnerships in the Middle East and North Africa. Against the backdrop of the Arab uprisings, the U.S. government has issued policy guidance relating to foreign assistance more broadly and security sector assistance in particular. RAND researchers analyzed potential new partnership models that could help implement this guidance, simultaneously strengthening security and justice sector cooperation and promoting reform across the Arab world and beyond. They devised the Enhanced Partnership Planning Model, which focuses on improving collaborative planning, rather than on using assistance as leverage to require partner nations to do what the United States wants. The model serves as a flexible framework that could support tailored, rigorous SJS planning by U.S. and partner nation stakeholders. This framework can support both policy-makers and program managers as they seek to implement new policy guidelines that integrate elements of accountability and reform while continuing to advance core U.S. interests and equities in a rapidly evolving regional context.
Military assistance, American --- Political planning --- Security Assistance Program --- Arab Spring, 2010 --- -Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Armies --- Arab Awakening, 2010 --- -Planning in politics --- Public policy --- American military assistance --- -Economic assistance, American --- Security, International --- Planning in politics --- Planning --- Policy sciences --- Politics, Practical --- Public administration --- -Military assistance, American
Choose an application
Guatemala is a major transit point for drugs bound for the United States and the recipient of U.S. counternarcotics aid and technical assistance, much of which is provided through U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) and U.S. Army South. As a first step by Guatemala in putting this aid to work toward developing its own counternarcotics capacity, the president of Guatemala established the Interagency Task Force (IATF) Tecún Umán. USSOUTHCOM has expressed the intent to apply the IATF as a model to other similarly porous border regions in the area. Thus, documenting and using lessons from the IATF Tecún Umán will help in the development of new and similar units. This report is intended to support that lessons-learned function, demonstrate how these preliminary lessons are being applied to future IATF development, and provide recommendations on how to resolve remaining IATF challenges. Lessons learned include the importance of establishing the interagency legal framework early, clearly defining the interagency relationships, developing an intelligence capability organic to the task force, implementing police authority and leadership, identifying measures of success, communicating the IATF's purpose and success to the public, and maintaining equipment. Remaining tasks include resolving the duality-of-command issue, improving operational planning capability, addressing corruption problems, and addressing IATF Tecún Umán issues before refocusing efforts to IATF Chortí. The United States has played a key role in supporting Guatemala's efforts to overcome these challenges. By investing in the IATF and building capacity, the United States will contribute to the Guatemalans' ability to sustain the IATF themselves.
Military assistance, American --- Drug control --- Drug control. --- Military assistance, American. --- Guatemala. --- American military assistance --- Narcotics, Control of --- Drug enforcement --- Drug law enforcement --- Drug policy --- Drug traffic control --- Drug traffic --- War on drugs --- Vice control --- Drugs --- Prevention --- Government policy --- Goatemala --- Gvatemala --- Republic of Guatemala --- República de Guatemala
Choose an application
Often treated by Americans as an exceptional form of warfare, insurgency is anything but. Spanning the globe, centuries, and societies, insurgency is quite common. Given the threat insurgency presents to U.S. interests and allies around the world, the importance of counterinsurgency is no surprise. However, history has shown that insurgencies are rarely defeated by outside powers. Rather, the best role for outsiders is an indirect one: training, advising, and equipping the local nation, which must win the war politically and militarily. And while counterinsurgency might seem to be a task most
Air power. --- Counterinsurgency. --- Electronic books. --- Military assistance, American. --- Military missions. --- World politics. --- Counterinsurgency --- Air power --- Military assistance, American --- Military missions --- World politics --- Military Science - General --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- United States. --- Missions, Military --- Missions, Naval --- Naval missions --- American military assistance --- AF --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF --- Government missions --- International relations --- Military education --- AF (Air force) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- USAF (Air force)
Choose an application
Arms transfers. --- Arms sales --- Arms traffic --- Foreign military sales --- Military sales --- Munitions --- Sale of military equipment --- International trade --- Arms race --- Defense industries --- Military assistance --- Civil-military relations. --- Finland.
Choose an application
The five U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Regional Centers for Security Studies have been helping partner nations build strategic capacity for almost 20 years. However, recent DoD budget constraints have put pressure on the regional centers (RCs) to increase efficiency. The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) asked RAND to conduct a study on the overall impact of the RCs, their effectiveness in advancing DoD policy priorities, the ways in which they assess their programs, and ways in which they could improve their impact and efficiency and the resulting outcomes. The RAND study team found that centers have had great success at the missions they have undertaken. They are high-impact components of U.S. security cooperation and engagement efforts, despite their relatively small budgets. The team identified 24 ways in which the centers advance U.S. interests, including building partner capacity, building relationships, fostering pro-U.S. outlooks, offering unique opportunities for engagement, and promoting regional dialogue that reduces tensions. However, RCs should improve impact-oriented data collection and analysis for improved assessment, methodically collecting such data over time. OSD and the combatant commands should improve their oversight and management of the RCs to ensure alignment with department- and theater-level objectives. In addition, OSD should maintain the RCs' focus on regional security challenges rather than refashioning them to address specific threats. Options to consider for greater impact include evaluating the balance between core residential courses and in-region workshops and determining whether and to what extent the centers should develop customized programs for DoD components so as to secure funds beyond the core budget they receive from OSD.
National security --- Military assistance, American --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Armies --- International cooperation --- American military assistance --- United States. --- Management --- Evaluation. --- D.O.D. --- DOD (Department of Defense) --- Mei-kuo kuo fang pu --- Ministerstvo oborony SShA --- National Military Establishment (U.S.) --- Министерство обороны США
Choose an application
"For both diplomatic and national security reasons, security cooperation continues to be important for the United States. The Department of Defense conducts an assortment of programs aimed at building the capacity of partner nations, and training is an important element of these efforts. The needs and existing capabilities of various nations differ, however, as will results. Planning for each building partner capacity (BPC) effort carefully, assessing progress while the effort is in progress, and assessing results are all important to ensure that it meets U.S. goals and partner expectations. This report presents a framework intended to aid all these steps. Before execution, the framework can help determine and plan for what might go wrong with the intended BPC effort. During BPC execution, the framework can help monitor progress to discover whether everything is going according to plan and, if not, what is wrong and what can be done about it. Finally, the framework can help determine whether the BPC has achieved its objectives and, if not, why and what can be done about it in the future"--Publisher's description
Military assistance, American --- Military education --- Soldiers --- National security --- Evaluation. --- International cooperation --- Training of --- National security policy --- NSP (National security policy) --- Security policy, National --- Economic policy --- International relations --- Military policy --- Armed Forces personnel --- Members of the Armed Forces --- Military personnel --- Military service members --- Service members --- Servicemen, Military --- Armed Forces --- Army schools --- Education, Military --- Military art and science --- Military schools --- Military training --- Schools, Military --- Education --- American military assistance --- Government policy --- Study and teaching
Choose an application
"For both diplomatic and national security reasons, security cooperation continues to be important for the United States. The needs and existing capabilities of various nations differ, however, as will results. In previous research, RAND identified a series of factors that correlate with the success of building partner capacity (BPC) efforts. Some of these are under U.S. control, and some are inherent in the partner nation or under its control. Strategic imperatives sometimes compel the United States to work with PNs that lack favorable characteristics but with which the United States needs to conduct BPC anyway. This report explores what the United States can do, when conducting BPC in challenging contexts, to maximize prospects for success. The authors address this question using the logic model outlined in a companion report and examining a series of case studies, looking explicitly at the challenges that can interfere with BPC. Some of the challenges stemmed from U.S. shortcomings, such as policy or funding issues; others from the partner's side, including issues with practices, personalities, baseline capacity, and lack of willingness; still others from disagreements among various stakeholders over objectives and approaches. Among the factors correlated with success in overcoming these challenges were consistency of funding and implementation, shared security interests, and matching objectives with the partner nation's ability to absorb and sustain capabilities."--Back cover.
Military assistance, American --- Military education --- Soldiers --- National security --- Armies --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- International cooperation --- Training of --- National security policy --- NSP (National security policy) --- Security policy, National --- Armed Forces personnel --- Members of the Armed Forces --- Military personnel --- Military service members --- Service members --- Servicemen, Military --- Army schools --- Education, Military --- Military art and science --- Military schools --- Military training --- Schools, Military --- American military assistance --- Government policy --- Study and teaching --- Economic policy --- International relations --- Military policy --- Armed Forces --- Education --- International cooperation.
Choose an application
Security force assistance (SFA) is a central pillar of the counterinsurgency campaign being waged by U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan. The outcome of the campaign hinges, in large measure, on the effectiveness of the assistance given to the Afghan National Army, Afghan National Police, and other security forces, assistance that the International Security Force must provide while fighting the insurgents. Yet senior U.S. military and civilian officials have posed many questions about the effectiveness of SFA in Afghanistan, and no empirically rigorous assessments exist to help answer these questions. This monograph analyzes SFA efforts in Afghanistan over time and documents U.S. and international approaches to building the Afghan National Security Forces from 2001 to 2009. Finally, it provides observations and recommendations that emerged from extensive fieldwork in Afghanistan in 2009 and their implications for the U.S Army.
Military assistance, American --- National security --- Internal security --- #SBIB:327.5H30 --- Security, Internal --- Insurgency --- Subversive activities --- Militaire organisaties – leger- stijdkracht --- Afghanistan. --- Afghan National Army --- ANA (Afghan National Army) --- Afghanistan National Security Forces. --- Subversive activitiesMilitaire organisaties – leger- stijdkrachtAfghanistan. --- افغانستان. --- Afghanistan. Afghan National Army. --- Internal security -- Afghanistan. --- Military assistance, American -- Afghanistan. --- National security -- Afghanistan. --- Combined operations (Military science) --- Stability operations --- Armed Forces --- Counterinsurgency --- Counterguerrilla warfare --- Guerrilla warfare --- Allied operations (Military science) --- Military art and science --- Strategy --- Tactics --- Armed Services --- Military, The --- Disarmament --- International Security Assistance Force (Afghanistan) --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization --- North Atlantic treaty organisation --- NAVO --- OTAN --- ISAF --- North Atlantic Treaty Organization. --- Kumak aw Hamkārī (Afghanistan) --- United States --- Stability operations. --- Stabilization operations --- NATO --- Afghanistan National Army
Listing 1 - 10 of 21 | << page >> |
Sort by
|