Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal presents an introduction to the nature, identification, and causes of fallacious reasoning, along with key questions for evaluation. Drawing from the latest work on fallacies as well as some of the standard ideas that have remained relevant since Aristotle, Christopher Tindale investigates central cases of major fallacies in order to understand what has gone wrong and how this has occurred. Dispensing with the approach that simply assigns labels and brief descriptions of fallacies, Tindale provides fuller treatments that recognize the dialectical and rhetorical contexts in which fallacies arise. This volume analyzes major fallacies through accessible, everyday examples. Critical questions are developed for each fallacy to help the student identify them and provide considered evaluations.
Logic --- Erreurs logiques --- Raisonnement --- Fallacies (Logic) --- Reasoning. --- Fallacies (Logic). --- Erreurs logiques. --- Raisonnement. --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Errors, Logical --- Sophisms (Logic) --- Sophistry (Logic) --- Reasoning --- Arts and Humanities --- Philosophy
Choose an application
Second edition of the introductory guidebook to the basic principles of constructing sound arguments and criticising bad ones. Non-technical in approach, it is based on 186 examples, which Douglas Walton, a leading authority in the field of informal logic, discusses and evaluates in clear, illustrative detail. Walton explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical responses. This edition takes into account many developments in the field of argumentation study that have occurred since 1989, many created by the author. Drawing on these developments, Walton includes and analyzes 36 new topical examples and also brings in work on argumentation schemes. Ideally suited for use in courses in informal logic and introduction to philosophy, this book will also be valuable to students of pragmatics, rhetoric, and speech communication.
Logic --- Logique --- Raisonnement --- Argumentation --- Logic. --- Reasoning. --- Reasoning --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Deduction (Logic) --- Deductive logic --- Dialectic (Logic) --- Logic, Deductive --- Intellect --- Philosophy --- Psychology --- Science --- Methodology --- Logique. --- Raisonnement. --- Argumentation. --- Arts and Humanities
Choose an application
Is our case strong enough to go to trial? Will interest rates go up? Can I trust this person? Such questions - and the judgments required to answer them - are woven into the fabric of everyday experience. This book, first published in 2002, examines how people make such judgments. The study of human judgment was transformed in the 1970s, when Kahneman and Tversky introduced their 'heuristics and biases' approach and challenged the dominance of strictly rational models. Their work highlighted the reflexive mental operations used to make complex problems manageable and illuminated how the same processes can lead to both accurate and dangerously flawed judgments. The heuristics and biases framework generated a torrent of influential research in psychology - research that reverberated widely and affected scholarship in economics, law, medicine, management, and political science. This book compiles the most influential research in the heuristics and biases tradition since the initial collection of 1982 (by Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky).
Reasoning (Psychology) --- Critical thinking. --- Jugement --- Raisonnement (Psychologie) --- Pensée critique --- Reasoning (Psychology). --- Pensée critique --- Judgment. --- Experimentele psychologie --- denken, begripsvorming en problem solving. --- Microeconomics --- Theory of knowledge --- Critical thinking --- Judgment --- Thought and thinking --- Critical reflection --- Reflection (Critical thinking) --- Reflection process --- Reflective thinking --- Thinking, Critical --- Thinking, Reflective --- Reflective learning --- Judgement --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Language and languages --- Psychology --- Wisdom --- Raisonnement --- Evaluative thinking --- Health Sciences --- Psychiatry & Psychology --- Processus cognitif --- Resolution de problemes --- Jugement. --- Esprit critique. --- Aspect psychologique.
Choose an application
This book uses different perspectives on argumentation to show how we create arguments, test them, attack and defend them, and deploy them effectively to justify beliefs and influence others. David Zarefsky uses a range of contemporary examples to show how arguments work and how they can be put together, beginning with simple individual arguments, and proceeding to the construction and analysis of complex cases incorporating different structures. Special attention is given to evaluating evidence and reasoning, the building blocks of argumentation. Zarefsky provides clear guidelines and tests for different kinds of arguments, as well as exercises that show student readers how to apply theories to arguments in everyday and public life. His comprehensive and integrated approach toward argumentation theory and practice will help readers to become more adept at critically examining everyday arguments as well as constructing arguments that will convince others.
Debates and debating. --- Forensics (Public speaking) --- Reasoning. --- Rhetoric. --- Débats et controverses. --- Raisonnement. --- Rhétorique. --- Logic --- Language and languages --- Speaking --- Authorship --- Expression --- Literary style --- Argumentation --- Ratiocination --- Reason --- Thought and thinking --- Judgment (Logic) --- Oratory --- Persuasion (Rhetoric) --- Public speaking --- Elocution --- Rhetoric --- Discussion --- Débats et controverses. --- Rhétorique.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|