Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
For almost a century, the Dominican Republic has faced considerable governance and corruption challenges. High levels of corruption were present long time ago, and still prevail today, even if their characteristics and manifestations have changed. Rule of law has been weak for a long time, and generally government effectiveness has not been high. By contrast, the country has performed better in terms of progress on fundamental political and civil liberties, and thus relatively speaking it rates satisfactorily in terms of voice and accountability. Civil society faces an enabling environment within which they can operate. Against such background, the innovative and participatory anti-corruption participatory initiative (IPAC) to improve governance and combat corruption is assessed, taking a relatively broad governance perspective. The paper does not attempt to provide an exhaustive evaluation of all aspects of the single initiative, but its aim is to contribute to the analysis and debate about the benefits and challenges of participatory initiatives promoting good governance and anti-corruption, in the Dominican Republic and elsewhere, while also concretely identifying possible follow-up initiatives. The first section provides in brief some of the general antecedents on the evolution of governance and corruption in the Dominican Republic. The second section discusses the IPAC strategy. The third and fourth sections present authors views on IPAC's achievements and shortcomings, respectively. The concluding section provides some follow-up recommendations.
Bribery --- Civil Society --- Corruption --- Democratic Government --- Ethics --- Governance --- National Governance --- Political Will --- Politics and Government --- Public Sector Development --- Social Accountability --- Social Development
Choose an application
Senegal has a reputation for having one of the most effective and far-reaching nutritionservice delivery systems in Africa. Chronic malnutrition has dropped to less than 20 percent, oneof the lowest in Sub-Saharan Africa. The reduction in stunting in particular has been deemed a success in Senegal with the prevalence of child stunting one of the lowest in Sub-Saharan Africa in absolute terms (Nene 2017). This success has at least in part been attributed to broad-based government commitment to nutrition, which has grown from USD 0.3 million per year in 2002 to USD 5.7 million per year in 2015, increasing from approximately 0.02 percent to 0.12 percent of the national budget. Yet concerns remain regarding whether the level of government support for nutrition is sufficient and the degree to which nutrition has been as effectively "mainstreamed" across major line ministries, such as agriculture, education, water and sanitation, socialprotection and health, to support both nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions. Moreover, the nutrition field as a whole is characterized by a myriad of actors (international donors, NGOs, and technical support agencies) whose interventions are not well coordinated, leading to duplications of effort and inefficiencies in the provision of services. A series ofexternal shocks, including food shortages stemming from drought, the global financial crisis, and the instability of prices for local foodstuffs since 2007, has revealed the continued need for additional investment in nutrition and better intersectoral coordination of activities to counter cyclical attention to nutrition and a predominant focus on food insufficiency rather than abroader focus on nutrition. To this end, the government of Senegal, through the CLM, is in the process of drafting the new PSMN to develop a reform agenda for the sector. The PSMN will lay out a framework and timeline for the development of a nutrition financing strategy that will requirespecific analysis of the sector spending and financial basis, linking it to the coverage and quality of nutrition services and assessing the contribution of different sectors and actors to the budget. As part of the Analysis and Perspective: 15 Years of Experience in the Development of Nutrition Policy in Senegal series, the World Bank commissioned this report to elaborate the specific political challenges to and opportunities for further raising the profile ofnutrition on the government's agenda and secure a sustainable effort to reduce maternal and child malnutrition. The nutrition agenda is often prone to political economy challenges when it competes for government support, as the impact of nutritional intervention is neither immediate nor tangible. Though the benefits of proper nutrition are life-long and are foundational to proper growth and development, nutrition can fall by the wayside in policymakers' inevitably shorter-termoutlook. With this in mind, the objective of this report was to identify the policy and political levers that can be used to foster government leadership and galvanize intersectoral coordination that mainstreams nutrition into government policies and programs and effectively, efficiently, and sustainably delivers nutrition interventions in Senegal.
Agriculture --- Decentralization --- Early Child and Children's Health --- Food and Nutrition Policy --- Food Security --- Governance --- Health Policy and Management --- Health, Nutrition and Population --- Malnutrition --- National Governance --- Nutrition --- Political Economy --- Political Will --- Politics and Government
Choose an application
Governments around the world are facing a double challenge. Their citizens are expecting everhigher standards of service and want to be able to interact with the government online as easily as they do with banks and Internet commerce companies. At the same time, governments need to reduce administrative costs and increase program effectiveness. For many years, "e-Government" has been a major contributor to meeting these challenges. In recent years Russia has made good progress on its existing e-Government strategy for providing digital services in parallel with other channels. To assist the Government of the Russian Federation with its plans to develop and launch a project that will be designed to address these issues and move the country towards a Digital Government, this report from the World Bank team sets out high level recommendations that are tailored to the needs of Russia, and that are in line with the best international practices. The analysis shows that the situation with the monitoring of e-Government development in the Russian Federation as a whole is not bad. There are large amounts of data on various aspects of using ICT for public administration and local self-government. Most of measurable indicators used in Russia, as in many other countries, relate to assessments of the level of e-Readiness of the country, and of particular regions or industries. To conclude, for Russia, as well as for other countries, there is a challenge to create a new system of monitoring for the use of ICT for public administration in the context of proper Digital Government maturity models.
Access to Information --- Decision Making --- E-Business --- E-Commerce --- E-Government --- Elections --- Governance --- Horizontal Integration --- Human Resources --- Information Technology --- Legal Framework --- National Governance --- National Security --- Open Government --- Political Will --- Private Sector --- Private Sector Development --- Public Sector --- Public Service Delivery --- Telecommunications --- Transparency
Choose an application
This report analyzes the main reasons or interests that have prevented some recent judicial and legal reforms in Honduras and Bolivia from becoming effective. It focuses on the reasons why criminal justice reforms were unable to put an end to the misuse of pre-trial detention. The report also includes a study of some of the reasons that have prevented criminal procedure code reforms from reducing the perception of impunity prevailing in both countries. With respect to the reforms of judicial selection mechanisms, it focuses on the interests that have prevented the public perception of judicial independence from improving in spite of the implementation of those reforms. The report includes an annex to Section 1, consultations with civil society in Honduras. Section 2 discusses civil and commercial justice in Paraguay. Section 3 discusses vested interests in legal and judicial reform projects in Guyana.
Access to Justice --- Accountability --- Alternative Dispute Resolution --- Audits --- Case Law --- Children and Youth --- Civil Rights --- Civil Society Organizations --- Constitutional Law --- Corruption & anticorruption Law --- Courts --- Democracies --- Discrimination --- Gangs --- Gender --- Human Rights --- International Cooperation --- International Law --- Judiciary --- Jurisdiction --- Law and Development --- Law Enforcement --- Legislation --- Litigation --- Mediation --- Patronage --- Political Will --- Public Opinion --- Rule of Law --- Sanctions --- Sentencing --- Social Development --- Youth
Choose an application
This paper looks at the existing tools and approaches most commonly used in developed and developing countries to review the stock of regulations. The tools reviewed can generate benefits in the short term, but they are most effective as part of a longer-term sustained initiative. This paper has a particular focus on the challenges that arise from their use in emerging and developing countries. The objectives of this paper include: 1) explaining the rationale for the use of these tools and approaches; 2) discussing each one of them in a succinct way; 3) considering the extent to which these tools can support more systemic regulatory reforms in the medium and long terms; and 4) considering the particular challenges and opportunities regarding their use in developing and emerging economies. Section one is a brief description of the rationale and context for applying tools and approaches to review the stock of regulation. It includes a reference to benefits and preconditions to make use of these tools. It also presents a categorization of the most commonly used tools and a comparative table on the way these tools can be applied. Section two presents a description of each of the different tools and approaches available, and discusses the way they are used and their main components. It includes references to international experiences in which these tools have been integrated into the regulatory reform process. Section three presents preliminary commentary about some of the potential advantages, disadvantages, and impacts of using these tools and approaches in developing countries. Some particular cases are presented to illustrate these trends. The section also includes a short description of the sequence observed in the use of some of these tools. Moreover, this section illustrates how these tools can (or cannot) generate gains in the short term and also provide a basis for further and broader regulatory reform programs.
Administrative & Regulatory Law --- Administrative Costs --- Administrative Procedures --- Advisory Services --- Burden of Proof --- Bureaucracy --- Business Environment --- Civil Liberties --- Corruption --- E-Business --- E-Government --- Economic Development --- Information Technology --- Innovation --- Insurance --- Law and Development --- Legislation --- Legislative Process --- Macroeconomics and Economic Growth --- Market Economy --- Political Will --- Private Sector --- Private Sector Development --- Public officials --- Regulators --- Rule of Law
Choose an application
This paper looks at the role and design of regulatory reform institutions in developing countries. These institutions are classified into four broad types: 1) regulatory reform units, commonly known in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as oversight bodies for regulatory reform; 2) high-level committees for regulatory reform, established in some countries to leverage support and take decisions at a high political level; 3) advisory and/or advocacy bodies in charge of proposing improvements to the regulatory system by strengthening coordination and consultation mechanisms and by promoting the regulatory reform agenda; and 4) Ad hoc institutions for regulatory reform, established to launch regulatory reform efforts and to work on a single defined task or activity. This paper is divided into the following sections: section one briefly reviews the theoretical debate and literature about the role of institutions in facilitating higher economic growth, focusing in particular on regulatory institutions and their relevance in developing countries; section two discusses the main features of regulatory reform institutions at the center of government, namely regulatory oversight bodies, high level committees, advocacy and/ or advisory bodies and ad-hoc institutions for regulatory reform; and section three identifies the features of these institutions that are considered to be best practice. Section three also identifies and discusses lessons learned and the implications for establishing and operating such institutions in developing country contexts.
Accountability --- Administrative Procedures --- Administrative Reform --- Advisory Services --- Bureaucracy --- Business Environment --- Business Regulation --- Children and Youth --- Consensus --- Corruption --- Decision Making --- Economic Development --- Good Governance --- Governance --- Governance Indicators --- Human Resources --- Investment Climate --- Judiciary --- Local Government --- National Governance --- Political Economy --- Political Instability --- Political Will --- Private Sector Development --- Public Sector --- Regulators --- Regulatory Agencies --- Social Development --- Transparency --- Vested Interests --- Violence
Choose an application
What motivates states to protect populations threatened by mass atrocities beyond their own borders? Most often, states and their representatives appeal to the principle of common humanity, acknowledging a conscience-shocking quality that demands a moral response. But though the idea of a common humanity is powerful, the question remains: to what extent is it effective in motivating action?The Limits of Common Humanity provides an ambitious interdisciplinary response to this question, theorizing the role of humanity as a motivational concept by building on insights from international relations, political philosophy, and international law. Through this analysis, Samuel Jarvis examines the influence the concept of humanity has had on the creation and mission of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) commitment, while highlighting the challenges that have restricted its application in practice. By providing a new framework for thinking about how political, legal, and moral arguments interact during the process of collective decision-making, Jarvis explores the contradictory ways in which states approach the protection of human beings from mass atrocity crimes, both domestically and internationally.In the context of a rapidly changing global order, The Limits of Common Humanity is a timely reappraisal of the R2P concept and its future application, arguing for a more politically motivated response to human protection that moves beyond an appeal for morality.
Humanity. --- Responsibility to protect (International law). --- Ban Ki-moon. --- Burma. --- Ethics. --- General Assembly. --- Intervention. --- Kofi Annan. --- Kosovo. --- Libya. --- Myanmar. --- Rwanda. --- Security Council. --- Sovereignty. --- Sri Lanka. --- Syria. --- United Nations. --- accountability. --- crimes against humanity. --- decision making. --- ethnic cleansing. --- foreign policy. --- genocide. --- human security. --- humanitarianism. --- international. --- mass atrocities. --- peace. --- political will. --- prevention. --- reform. --- regional organisations. --- rising powers. --- veto. --- war.
Choose an application
The aim of this study is to convince national and multilateral policy makers of the importance of the public sphere concept for democratic governance and strategic post-conflict assistance planning with the objective of positive and sustainable change in current post-conflict assistance policy and practice. The study introduces the conceptual thinking underlying the public sphere framework and, citing evidence from different countries, highlights its relevance and calls for its application in post-conflict environments. For practitioners the study provides a public sphere assessment toolkit and a toolbox for interventions. It also offers concrete examples and recommendations on how to address the specific governance challenges identified through a public sphere analysis in three countries: Timor-Leste, Liberia and Burundi.
Accountability --- Administrative Reform --- Brain Drain --- Capacity Building --- Civil Rights --- Civil Society --- Civil Society Organizations --- Community Development and Empowerment --- Conflict and Development --- Constituencies --- Corruption --- Corruption & anticorruption Law --- Crime --- Decentralization --- Decision Making --- Elections --- Ethics --- Good Governance --- Governance --- Human Capital --- Human Resources --- Human Rights --- Informal Sector --- Judicial Reform --- Judiciary --- Law and Development --- Legal Framework --- Legislation --- Legislative Process --- Market Economy --- National Governance --- National Security --- Political Institutions --- Political Parties --- Political Will --- Post Conflict Reconstruction --- Public Finance --- Public Hearings --- Public officials --- Public Policy --- Public Sector --- Refugees --- Respect --- Rule of Law --- Social Development --- Technical Training --- Transparency --- Trauma --- Treaties --- Violence --- Voting --- Youth
Choose an application
There is broad recognition, across the political spectrum and in both 'northern' and 'southern' countries, that justice reform, and more generally the promotion of the 'rule of law', are central to development policy, particularly in conflict-affected, fragile and violent contexts. More recently an increased focus on global security and the interaction between security and development as put a renewed emphasis on such efforts. However, while legal, regulatory and 'justice' institutions are now seen as key part of the 'solution' to problems of conflict, fragility and development, this recognition is not matched by a correspondingly clear sense of what should be done, how it should be done, by whom, in what order, or how 'success' may be determined. There often tends to be a clear misunderstanding of both the nature of the problem and (thus) of the solution. In this paper, the author seek to provide some insight into these questions and sketch out a practical conception of effective justice reform in situations of conflict and fragility that may provide the basis for effective programming.
Access to Justice --- Accountability --- Administrative Law --- Arbitration --- Armed Forces --- Bankruptcy --- Bribery --- Children and Youth --- Civil Society Organizations --- Common Law --- Conflict and Development --- Conflict Resolution --- Constitutions --- Corruption --- Corruption & anticorruption Law --- Courts --- Customary Law --- Discrimination --- Economic Development --- Elections --- Empowerment --- Equality --- Federalism --- Foundations --- Freedom of Information --- Gangs --- Gender --- Genocide --- Good Governance --- Homicide --- Human Rights --- Informal Sector --- Inheritance --- International Cooperation --- International Donors --- International Law --- Judicial Reform --- Judiciary --- Jurisdiction --- Land Disputes --- Law and Development --- Leadership --- Legal Aid --- Legal Products --- Legislation --- Legislative Process --- Mediation --- Patronage --- Peacebuilding --- Political Parties --- Political Will --- Post Conflict Reconstruction --- Privatization --- Property Rights --- Public Opinion --- Rule of Law --- Sanctions --- Separation of Powers --- Social Development --- Technical Assistance --- Theft --- Transparency --- Universities --- Violence --- War Crimes --- Youth
Choose an application
The United States Supreme Court closed the courthouse door to federal litigation to narrow educational funding and opportunity gaps in schools when it ruled in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez in 1973 that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to education. Rodriguez pushed reformers back to the state courts where they have had some success in securing reforms to school funding systems through education and equal protection clauses in state constitutions, but far less success in changing the basic structure of school funding in ways that would ensure access to equitable and adequate funding for schools. Given the limitations of state school funding litigation, education reformers continue to seek new avenues to remedy inequitable disparities in educational opportunity and achievement, including recently returning to federal court. 0This book is the first comprehensive examination of three issues regarding a federal right to education: why federal intervention is needed to close educational opportunity and achievement gaps; the constitutional and statutory legal avenues that could be employed to guarantee a federal right to education; and, the scope of what a federal right to education should guarantee. 'A Federal Right to Education' provides a timely and thoughtful analysis of how the United States could fulfill its unmet promise to provide equal educational opportunity and the American Dream to every child, regardless of race, class, language proficiency, or neighborhood.
Right to education --- Educational equalization --- Law and legislation --- Right to learn --- Civil rights --- Education, Compulsory --- Education and state --- Educational law and legislation --- American dream. --- Constitution. --- Education Amendment. --- Latinas. --- Latinos. --- Spending Clause. --- Supreme Court. --- achievement gap. --- achievement gaps. --- adequacy litigation. --- adequate education. --- at-risk students. --- civic participation. --- constitutional amendment. --- constitutional interpretation. --- criminal justice. --- education federalism. --- education inadequacies. --- education inequality. --- educational opportunity gaps. --- educational opportunity. --- equal access to an excellent education. --- equal citizenship. --- equal education. --- equal educational opportunity. --- equal liberty. --- equal opportunity. --- equal protection. --- evidence-based reforms. --- excellent and equitable educational opportunity. --- federal education legislation. --- federal government. --- federal right to education. --- federal role in education. --- fiscal capacity. --- high-quality education. --- just society. --- libertystate constitutional rights. --- opportunity gap. --- opportunity gaps. --- opportunity to compete. --- originalism. --- political will. --- privileges and immunities. --- right to education. --- segregation. --- sovereignty. --- state constitutions. --- state courts. --- state education chiefs. --- state fiscal equity litigation. --- state legislatures. --- state school finance litigation. --- substantive due process.
Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|