Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Ce livre n'est pas un livre de théorie, au sens où celle-ci serait un système totalisant. Et pourtant il est traversé de bout en bout par une même inspiration théorique, à la fois simple et persistante, celle que le cinéma n'existe que par, dans et avec la communication. Dire cela, c'est refuser de faire du film une chose en soi, une oeuvre qui pense toute seule ; c'est envisager les multiples relations qu'il tisse avec des êtres humains : réalisateur, acteur ou spectateur. Comment le film rend-il la sensation ? Comment nous touche-t-il ? Quelles traces garde-t-il du regard d'un homme ou d'une femme sur ses acteurs ? Comment les auteurs construisent-ils nos regards par leurs nombreuses interventions dans les médias ? Et comment communiquent-ils au travers de leurs films avec d'autres cinéastes ?
Motion pictures --- Communication --- Cinéma --- Social aspects --- Audio-visual aids --- Aspect social --- Aides audiovisuelles --- Philosophie --- Cinéma --- Cinéma. --- Philosophie.
Choose an application
Libraries --- -Audio-visual library service --- 681.3*H36 --- 681.3*H36 Library automation --- Library automation --- Multimedia library services --- Instructional materials centers --- Documentation --- Public institutions --- Librarians --- Special collections --- -Microforms --- Audio-visual library service --- Special collections&delete& --- Microforms --- Alphabetical cataloguing --- Photography --- Audio-visual library service. --- Microforms.
Choose an application
In the lead essay for this volume, Joshua Foa Dienstag engages in a critical encounter with the work of Stanley Cavell on cinema, focusing sceptical attention on the claims made for the contribution of cinema to the ethical character of democratic life. In this debate, Dienstag mirrors the celebrated dialogue between Rousseau and Jean D'Alembert on theatre, casting Cavell as D'Alembert in his view that we can learn to become better citizens and better people by observing a staged representation of human life, with Dienstag arguing, after Rousseau, that this misunderstands the relationship between original and copy, even more so in the medium of film than in the medium of theatre. The argument is developed further by essays from Clare Woodford, Tracy B. Strong, Margaret Kohn, Davide Panagia and Thomas Dunn, to which Dienstag responds in the concluding chapter, 'A reply to my critics'.
Motion pictures --- Political aspects. --- Philosophy. --- Plots, themes, etc. --- Cavell, Stanley, --- Motion picture plays --- Motion picture plots --- Plots (Drama, novel, etc.) --- Film genres --- Cinema --- Feature films --- Films --- Movies --- Moving-pictures --- Audio-visual materials --- Mass media --- Performing arts --- Themes, motives --- History and criticism --- Cavell, Stanley Louis, --- Goldstein, Stanley Louis, --- カヴェル, スタンリー, --- cinema --- stanley cavell --- ethics --- democracy --- political theory --- Humanities. --- Ethics and moral philosophy. --- POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory. --- Philosophy & Religion --- Philosophy --- Topics in philosophy --- Ethics & moral philosophy.
Listing 1 - 3 of 3 |
Sort by
|