Narrow your search

Library

KU Leuven (4)

UCLouvain (3)

KBR (2)

ULB (2)

LUCA School of Arts (1)

Odisee (1)

Thomas More Kempen (1)

Thomas More Mechelen (1)

UAntwerpen (1)

UCLL (1)

More...

Resource type

book (4)


Language

Latin (4)


Year
From To Submit

2013 (1)

2011 (1)

2004 (1)

1984 (1)

Listing 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by

Book
Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis Societatis Jesu in octo libros physicorum Aristotelis
Author:
ISBN: 3487074699 9783487074696 Year: 1984 Publisher: Hildesheim Olms


Book
Anonymi quaestiones super octavum librum physicorum
Author:
ISBN: 8884500478 Year: 2004 Volume: 11 43 Publisher: Firenze Sismel


Book
Nicole Oresme, Questiones super physicam (books I-VII).
Authors: --- --- --- ---
ISBN: 9789004236370 9789004250253 9004236376 Year: 2013 Volume: 112 Publisher: Leiden Brill


Book
Anonymus londiniensis : de medicina.
Authors: ---
ISBN: 9783110218718 9783110239034 3110239035 3110218712 1283399598 9786613399595 Year: 2011 Publisher: Berlin de Gruyter

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Great change has pervaded the evaluation of this text, since it was first published by Diels in 1893: it appeared to be a text consisting of notes on an introductory course of medicine, badly copied by a scribe or an uneducated pupil, probably written in the age of Domitian or Trajan. Its most disturbing aspect was the presence of a doxography on the causes of disease, attributed to Aristotle, recording numerous doxai of 5th and 4th century physicians and philosophers, including Hippocrates, who constituted the crux of the controversy, because the figure ill accorded with the image that had taken shape in nineteenth-century historiography. In recent years new insights have shown that actually it is an autograph, an unfinished draft, that the author, to be dated to 1st cent. AD, excerpted earlier derivative literature but has also views of his own, that the doxography derived from 'Aristotle' is to be clearly placed in the early Peripatetic setting, that the physiological section, which follows, has a background of school practice in dialectical argument, that the main authorities "ed in the text (Herophilus, Erasistratus and Asclepiades) have different roles (Herophilus's is the most positive) but the authors always feels at liberty to confute their opinions and treats them as characters of the same scientific context.

Listing 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by