Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Philosophy of nature --- Aristotle --- Science, Ancient. --- Physics --- Early works to 1800. --- Aristotle. --- -Science, Ancient --- Ancient science --- Science, Primitive --- Science --- Natural philosophy --- Philosophy, Natural --- Physical sciences --- Dynamics --- Early works to 1800 --- History --- Aristoteles. --- Aristoteles --- Aristote --- Aristotile --- Science, Ancient --- Physics - Early works to 1800. --- Aristotle. - Physics.
Choose an application
Handschriften [Latijnse ] (Middeleeuwse en moderne) --- Manuscripts [Latin ] (Medieval and modern) --- Manuscrits latins (Médiévaux et modernes) --- Medieval and modern latin manuscripts --- Motion --- Physics --- Science, Ancient --- Ancient science --- Science, Primitive --- Science --- Kinetics --- Dynamics --- Kinematics --- History --- Aristotle. --- Cicero, Marcus Tullius --- Criticism [Textual ] --- Scipio Aemilianus, Publius Cornelius --- In literature --- Scipio Africanus --- Manuscripts --- Transmission of texts --- Europe --- To 1500
Choose an application
Commentary on Aristotle's Physics.
Science, Ancient. --- Physics --- Sciences anciennes --- Physique --- Early works to 1800. --- Ouvrages avant 1800 --- Aristotle. --- Science, Ancient --- 113 --- 1 <38> ARISTOTELES --- Ancient science --- Science, Primitive --- Science --- Algemene natuurwetten. Oorsprong van de wereld. Schepping. Kosmogonie --- Griekse filosofie--ARISTOTELES --- History --- Aristoteles --- 1 <38> ARISTOTELES Griekse filosofie--ARISTOTELES --- 113 Algemene natuurwetten. Oorsprong van de wereld. Schepping. Kosmogonie --- Aristoteles. --- Aristotle. - Physics
Choose an application
Great change has pervaded the evaluation of this text, since it was first published by Diels in 1893: it appeared to be a text consisting of notes on an introductory course of medicine, badly copied by a scribe or an uneducated pupil, probably written in the age of Domitian or Trajan. Its most disturbing aspect was the presence of a doxography on the causes of disease, attributed to Aristotle, recording numerous doxai of 5th and 4th century physicians and philosophers, including Hippocrates, who constituted the crux of the controversy, because the figure ill accorded with the image that had taken shape in nineteenth-century historiography. In recent years new insights have shown that actually it is an autograph, an unfinished draft, that the author, to be dated to 1st cent. AD, excerpted earlier derivative literature but has also views of his own, that the doxography derived from 'Aristotle' is to be clearly placed in the early Peripatetic setting, that the physiological section, which follows, has a background of school practice in dialectical argument, that the main authorities "ed in the text (Herophilus, Erasistratus and Asclepiades) have different roles (Herophilus's is the most positive) but the authors always feels at liberty to confute their opinions and treats them as characters of the same scientific context.
Medicine, Greek and Roman. --- Medicine --- Médecine grecque et romaine --- Médecine --- Philosophy --- Early works to 1800. --- Philosophie --- Ouvrages avant 1800 --- Medicine, Greek and Roman --- Médecine grecque et romaine --- Médecine --- Clinical sciences --- Medical profession --- Human biology --- Life sciences --- Medical sciences --- Pathology --- Physicians --- Greek medicine --- Medicine, Roman --- Medicine, Unani --- Roman medicine --- Tibb (Medicine) --- Unani medicine --- Unani-Tibb (Medicine) --- Medicine, Ancient --- Health Workforce --- Medicine, Greek and Roman - Early works to 1800 --- Medicine - Philosophy - Early works to 1800 --- Papyrology, Ancient Science and Medicine, Ancient philosophy, Greek texts.
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|