Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Burden of proof --- Human rights --- Presumption of innocence --- Presumption of innocence --- Presumption of innocence

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The presumption of innocence is universally recognized as a fundamental human right and a core principle in the administration of criminal justice. Nonetheless, statutes creating criminal offences regularly depart from the presumption of innocence by requiring defendants to prove specific matters in order to avoid conviction. Legislatures and courts seek to justify this departure by asserting that the reversal of the burden of proof is necessary to meet the community interest in prosecuting serious crime and maintaining workable criminal sanctions. This book investigates the supposed justifications for limitation of the presumption of innocence. It does so through a comprehensive analysis of the history, rationale and scope of the presumption of innocence. It is argued that the values underlying the presumption of innocence are of such fundamental importance to individual liberty that they cannot be sacrificed on the altar of community interest. In particular, it is argued that a test of 'proportionality', which seeks to weigh individual rights against the community interest, is inappropriate in the context of the presumption of innocence and that courts ought instead to focus on whether an impugned measure threatens the values which the presumption is designed to protect. The book undertakes a complete and systematic review of the United Kingdom and Strasbourg authority on the presumption of innocence. It also draws upon extensive references to comparative material, both judicial and academic, from the United States, Canada and South Africa

Presumption of innocence. --- Presumption of innocence --- Burden of proof. --- Human rights. --- Comparative law.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Presumption of innocence. --- Burden of proof. --- Comparative law.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"In Guilt by accusation, Dershowitz provides an in-depth analysis of the false accusations against him, alongside a full presentation of the exculpatory evidence that proves his account, including emails from his accuser and an admission of his innocence from her lawyer, David Boies. Additionally, he examines current attitudes toward accusations of sexual misconduct, which are today, in the age of #MeToo, accepted as implicit truth without giving the accused a fair chance to defend themselves and their innocence, and suggests possible pathways back to a society and legal system in which due process is respected above public opinion and the whims of social media mobs."

Malicious accusation --- Sex crimes --- Due process of law --- Presumption of innocence --- Dershowitz, Alan M.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In this monograph, Aistė Mickonytė examines the compliance of the European anti-cartel enforcement procedure with the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The author maintains that the pursuit of manifestly severe punishment with insistence of the European Commission on administrative-level procedural safeguards is inconsistent with the robust standards of protection under the Convention. Arguing that EU anti-cartel procedure is criminal within the meaning of the Convention, this work considers this procedure in light of the core elements of the presumption of innocence such as the burden of proof and the principle of fault. The author zeroes in on the de facto automatic liability of parental companies for offences committed by their subsidiaries.

Cartels --- Presumption of innocence --- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms