Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Allegiance --- Civil rights --- Liberty --- Allégeance --- Droits de l'homme --- Liberté

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Middle East --- Rome --- Moyen-Orient --- History --- Foreign relations --- Histoire --- Relations extérieures --- Relations --- Kings and rulers. --- Civilization. --- Relations extérieures --- Rois et souverains --- Allégeance --- Romains --- Proche-Orient --- Antiquité --- 30 av J-C-476 (Empire) --- Jusqu'à 622

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Loyalty. --- Exiles --- Governments in exile. --- Refugee governments --- International law --- International relations --- Sovereignty --- State, The --- Persons --- Aliens --- Deportees --- Refugees --- Conduct of life --- Constancy --- Political activity. --- Governments in exile --- Allegiance --- Exilés --- Gouvernements en exil --- Allégeance

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This interdisciplinary volume maintains the importance of a spatial understanding of society and history, but suggests a way of conceiving of borders and space that goes beyond a school map of states. Its subject is the struggle among differing spatial logics, or mental maps. It is concerned with the meaning that state borders hold for people, but recognizes that such meaning varies and is contested by other social formations. To what degree do state borders encase the mechanisms that make the decisive rules governing people's lives and to what extent do they give way to other rulemakers? To what extent do states circumscribe the communities to which people feel attached and to what extent do they intersect with other communities of belonging? These essays home in on the struggles and conflicting demands on people, given that state borders are not automatically pre-eminent and that other spatial logics demand attention.

Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Boundaries. --- Allegiance. --- Group identity. --- Collective identity --- Community identity --- Cultural identity --- Social identity --- Identity (Psychology) --- Social psychology --- Collective memory --- Loyalty, Political --- Political loyalty --- Loyalty --- Citizenship --- Patriotism --- Borders (Geography) --- Boundary lines --- Frontiers --- Geographical boundaries --- International boundaries --- Lines, Boundary --- Natural boundaries --- Perimeters (Boundaries) --- Political boundaries --- Borderlands --- Territory, National --- Frontières --- Allégeance --- Identité collective --- Social Sciences --- Political Science

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. Rather, its uniqueness stems from the culture it created and the loyalty it inspired across an area that stretched from the Tyne to the Euphrates. Moreover, the empire created this culture with a bureaucracy smaller than that of a typical late-twentieth-century research university. In approaching this problem, Clifford Ando does not ask the ever-fashionable question, Why did the Roman empire fall? Rather, he asks, Why did the empire last so long? Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified. This consensus was itself the product of a complex conversation between the central government and its far-flung peripheries. Ando investigates the mechanisms that sustained this conversation, explores its contribution to the legitimation of Roman power, and reveals as its product the provincial absorption of the forms and content of Roman political and legal discourse. Throughout, his sophisticated and subtle reading is informed by current thinking on social formation by theorists such as Max Weber, Jürgen Habermas, and Pierre Bourdieu.

Allegiance --- -Political stability --- -Destabilization (Political science) --- Political instability --- Stability, Political --- Loyalty, Political --- Political loyalty --- Rome --- Cultural policy --- -Influence. --- History --- Provinces --- -Administration. --- Political stability --- Roman provinces --- Administration. --- Influence. --- Allégeance --- Stabilité politique --- Politics and government --- Administration --- Politique et gouvernement --- Histoire --- State governments --- Destabilization (Political science) --- Consensus (Social sciences) --- Legitimacy of governments --- Loyalty --- Citizenship --- Patriotism --- Rim --- Roman Empire --- Roman Republic (510-30 B.C.) --- Romi (Empire) --- Byzantine Empire --- Rome (Italy) --- Allegiance - Rome. --- Political stability - Rome. --- Influence --- administration. --- allegiance. --- ancient rome. --- ancient world. --- augustus. --- body politic. --- bourdieu. --- bureaucracy. --- central government. --- christian ideology. --- empire. --- fall of the empire. --- government. --- habermas. --- history. --- imperial identity. --- max weber. --- nonfiction. --- political consensus. --- political stability. --- politics. --- power struggle. --- power. --- provinces. --- provincial loyalty. --- revolt. --- roman emperors. --- roman empire. --- roman government. --- roman history. --- roman military. --- roman senate. --- rome. --- social formation.