Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Is the God of traditional theism logically incompatible with all the evil in the world? In his book, Is a Good God Logically Possible? (Palgrave paperback, 2019) James Sterba argues that the God of traditional theism is logically incompatible with especially the horrendous evil consequences of moral and natural evil that exists in our world. In this Special Issue in Religions, sixteen philosophers challenge Sterba’s argument and he responds to all of them.
Religion & beliefs --- moral evil --- natural evil --- Free Will Defence --- laws of nature --- miracles --- James P. Sterba --- Sterba --- problem of evil --- John Hick --- divine intervention --- rights --- James Sterba --- existence of God --- theodicies --- ethical principles --- Mackie --- Plantinga --- logical --- evidential --- evil as privation of the good --- God's goodness --- concepts of God --- classical theism --- intervention --- permission --- deism --- compassion --- Wittgenstein --- grammar --- process philosophy --- theism --- ontological argument --- theodicy --- metaphysics --- free will defense --- Alvin Plantinga --- David Lewis --- Molinism --- Open Theism --- theological compatibilism --- Hugh McCann --- J.L. Mackie --- Thomas Aquinas --- Brian Davies --- divine obligations --- Richard Swinburne --- free will --- God --- moral --- morality --- evil --- good --- moral skepticism --- moral epistemology --- skeptical theism --- modal skepticism --- axiological skepticism --- ethics --- philosophy of religion --- horrendous evil --- incommensurate good --- optimal grace --- sanctification --- forgiveness --- Marilyn Adams --- William Hasker --- univocity thesis --- doctrine of divine transcendence --- horrendous evils --- compensatory response to the problem of evil --- Marilyn McCord Adams --- Karl Barth --- Duns Scotus --- logical argument from evil --- Mirandolian theodicy --- the sovereignty of humanity --- Dostoyevsky on evil --- relational conceptions of selfhood --- process theology --- process theodicy --- Charles Hartshorne --- moral evil --- natural evil --- Free Will Defence --- laws of nature --- miracles --- James P. Sterba --- Sterba --- problem of evil --- John Hick --- divine intervention --- rights --- James Sterba --- existence of God --- theodicies --- ethical principles --- Mackie --- Plantinga --- logical --- evidential --- evil as privation of the good --- God's goodness --- concepts of God --- classical theism --- intervention --- permission --- deism --- compassion --- Wittgenstein --- grammar --- process philosophy --- theism --- ontological argument --- theodicy --- metaphysics --- free will defense --- Alvin Plantinga --- David Lewis --- Molinism --- Open Theism --- theological compatibilism --- Hugh McCann --- J.L. Mackie --- Thomas Aquinas --- Brian Davies --- divine obligations --- Richard Swinburne --- free will --- God --- moral --- morality --- evil --- good --- moral skepticism --- moral epistemology --- skeptical theism --- modal skepticism --- axiological skepticism --- ethics --- philosophy of religion --- horrendous evil --- incommensurate good --- optimal grace --- sanctification --- forgiveness --- Marilyn Adams --- William Hasker --- univocity thesis --- doctrine of divine transcendence --- horrendous evils --- compensatory response to the problem of evil --- Marilyn McCord Adams --- Karl Barth --- Duns Scotus --- logical argument from evil --- Mirandolian theodicy --- the sovereignty of humanity --- Dostoyevsky on evil --- relational conceptions of selfhood --- process theology --- process theodicy --- Charles Hartshorne
Choose an application
Is the God of traditional theism logically incompatible with all the evil in the world? In his book, Is a Good God Logically Possible? (Palgrave paperback, 2019) James Sterba argues that the God of traditional theism is logically incompatible with especially the horrendous evil consequences of moral and natural evil that exists in our world. In this Special Issue in Religions, sixteen philosophers challenge Sterba’s argument and he responds to all of them.
Religion & beliefs --- moral evil --- natural evil --- Free Will Defence --- laws of nature --- miracles --- James P. Sterba --- Sterba --- problem of evil --- John Hick --- divine intervention --- rights --- James Sterba --- existence of God --- theodicies --- ethical principles --- Mackie --- Plantinga --- logical --- evidential --- evil as privation of the good --- God’s goodness --- concepts of God --- classical theism --- intervention --- permission --- deism --- compassion --- Wittgenstein --- grammar --- process philosophy --- theism --- ontological argument --- theodicy --- metaphysics --- free will defense --- Alvin Plantinga --- David Lewis --- Molinism --- Open Theism --- theological compatibilism --- Hugh McCann --- J.L. Mackie --- Thomas Aquinas --- Brian Davies --- divine obligations --- Richard Swinburne --- free will --- God --- moral --- morality --- evil --- good --- moral skepticism --- moral epistemology --- skeptical theism --- modal skepticism --- axiological skepticism --- ethics --- philosophy of religion --- horrendous evil --- incommensurate good --- optimal grace --- sanctification --- forgiveness --- Marilyn Adams --- William Hasker --- univocity thesis --- doctrine of divine transcendence --- horrendous evils --- compensatory response to the problem of evil --- Marilyn McCord Adams --- Karl Barth --- Duns Scotus --- logical argument from evil --- Mirandolian theodicy --- the sovereignty of humanity --- Dostoyevsky on evil --- relational conceptions of selfhood --- process theology --- process theodicy --- Charles Hartshorne --- n/a --- God's goodness
Choose an application
The first woman known to have written in English, the fourteenth-century mystic Julian of Norwich has inspired generations of Christians with her reflections on the "motherhood" of Jesus, and her assurance that, despite evil, "all shall be well." In this book, Denise Baker reconsiders Julian not only as an eloquent and profound visionary but also as an evolving, sophisticated theologian of great originality. Focusing on Julian's Book of Showings, in which the author records a series of revelations she received during a critical illness in May 1373, Baker provides the first historical assessment of Julian's significance as a writer and thinker.Inscribing her visionary experience in the short version of her Showings, Julian contemplated the revelations for two decades before she achieved the understanding that enabled her to complete the long text. Baker first traces the genesis of Julian's visionary experience to the practice of affective piety, such as meditations on the life of Christ and, in the arts, a depiction of a suffering rather than triumphant Christ on the cross. Julian's innovations become apparent in the long text. By combining late medieval theology of salvation with the mystics' teachings on the nature of humankind, she arrives at compassionate, optimistic, and liberating conclusions regarding the presence of evil in the world, God's attitude toward sinners, and the possibility of universal salvation. She concludes her theodicy by comparing the connections between the Trinity and humankind to familial relationships, emphasizing Jesus' role as mother. Julian's strategy of revisions and her artistry come under scrutiny in the final chapter of this book, as Baker demonstrates how this writer brings her readers to reenact her own struggle in understanding the revelations.Originally published in 1994.The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Mysticism --- History --- Aelred of Rievaulx. --- Aevum. --- Affective piety. --- Allusion. --- Analogy. --- Anchorite. --- Anno Domini. --- Anselm of Canterbury. --- Archetype. --- Augustine of Hippo. --- Augustinian theodicy. --- Augustinians. --- Bernard McGinn (theologian). --- Bernard of Clairvaux. --- Body of Christ. --- Canonical hours. --- Catharism. --- Christian. --- Christology. --- Church Fathers. --- Cistercians. --- Contrition. --- Curate. --- Damnation. --- Deity. --- Divine grace. --- Dualism. --- El Shaddai. --- Elaine Pagels. --- Erudition. --- Exegesis. --- Felix culpa. --- Glorification. --- God the Father. --- God the Son. --- God. --- Grace Jantzen. --- Hagiography. --- Hermeneutics. --- Hilda of Whitby. --- Iconography. --- Image of God. --- Immanence. --- Intercession. --- John Hick. --- John Meyendorff. --- John of Beverley. --- Julian May. --- Julian of Norwich. --- Justification (theology). --- Litany. --- Luttrell Psalter. --- Manichaeism. --- Manifestation of God. --- Margery Kempe. --- Mary Magdalene. --- Meister Eckhart. --- Messiah. --- Metonymy. --- Mysticism. --- Neoplatonism. --- Norwich Cathedral. --- Omnipotence. --- Omniscience. --- Origen. --- Parable. --- Patristics. --- Pelagianism. --- Penitential. --- Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. --- Plotinus. --- Predestination. --- Prevenient grace. --- Problem of evil. --- Propitiation. --- Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. --- Purgatory. --- Ralph Manheim. --- Religion. --- Reprobation. --- Richard Rolle. --- Salvation. --- Sanctification. --- Scholasticism. --- Sermon. --- Sola gratia. --- Soteriology. --- Spirituality. --- Tertullian. --- The Book of Margery Kempe. --- The Mirror of Simple Souls. --- The Parson's Tale. --- Theodicy. --- Theology. --- Thomas Aquinas. --- Thomism. --- Treatise. --- Venial sin. --- Walter Hilton. --- William of Ockham. --- Julian,
Choose an application
Is the God of traditional theism logically incompatible with all the evil in the world? In his book, Is a Good God Logically Possible? (Palgrave paperback, 2019) James Sterba argues that the God of traditional theism is logically incompatible with especially the horrendous evil consequences of moral and natural evil that exists in our world. In this Special Issue in Religions, sixteen philosophers challenge Sterba’s argument and he responds to all of them.
moral evil --- natural evil --- Free Will Defence --- laws of nature --- miracles --- James P. Sterba --- Sterba --- problem of evil --- John Hick --- divine intervention --- rights --- James Sterba --- existence of God --- theodicies --- ethical principles --- Mackie --- Plantinga --- logical --- evidential --- evil as privation of the good --- God’s goodness --- concepts of God --- classical theism --- intervention --- permission --- deism --- compassion --- Wittgenstein --- grammar --- process philosophy --- theism --- ontological argument --- theodicy --- metaphysics --- free will defense --- Alvin Plantinga --- David Lewis --- Molinism --- Open Theism --- theological compatibilism --- Hugh McCann --- J.L. Mackie --- Thomas Aquinas --- Brian Davies --- divine obligations --- Richard Swinburne --- free will --- God --- moral --- morality --- evil --- good --- moral skepticism --- moral epistemology --- skeptical theism --- modal skepticism --- axiological skepticism --- ethics --- philosophy of religion --- horrendous evil --- incommensurate good --- optimal grace --- sanctification --- forgiveness --- Marilyn Adams --- William Hasker --- univocity thesis --- doctrine of divine transcendence --- horrendous evils --- compensatory response to the problem of evil --- Marilyn McCord Adams --- Karl Barth --- Duns Scotus --- logical argument from evil --- Mirandolian theodicy --- the sovereignty of humanity --- Dostoyevsky on evil --- relational conceptions of selfhood --- process theology --- process theodicy --- Charles Hartshorne --- n/a --- God's goodness
Listing 1 - 4 of 4 |
Sort by
|