Listing 1 - 10 of 11 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
F-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Air Forces --- Cost control --- Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- X-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Airplanes, Military --- Lockheed Martin aircraft --- United States. --- Reorganization. --- Appropriations and expenditures. --- AF (Air force) --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF (Air force) --- F-35 (Military aircraft) --- Cost control.
Choose an application
F-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Air Forces --- Cost control --- Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- X-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Airplanes, Military --- Lockheed Martin aircraft --- United States. --- Reorganization. --- Appropriations and expenditures. --- AF (Air force) --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF (Air force) --- F-35 (Military aircraft) --- Cost control.
Choose an application
RAND was asked by the U.S. Air Force to carry out analyses needed to determine alternatives for the use of CONUS Centralized Intermediate Repair Facilities (CIRFs) that would provide increased maintenance efficiency (compared with traditional, decentralized structures) without reducing combat support capability. These CIRFs would provide off-equipment repair of propulsion and avionics components for the F-15, F-16, and A/OA-10. RAND developed an optimization-based analytic method for CIRF network design that identifies a range of cost-effective alternatives. Aircraft force structure bed-downs resulting from the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) recommendations were used in the analyses, and all CONUS active duty bases and Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Command installations were included, considering support to three tasking scenarios--normal peacetime training and readiness, Air and Space Expeditionary Force (AEF) deployment, and major regional conflicts (MRCs). General results from the analyses are: CONUS CIRF is a cost-effective maintenance strategy for nearly all commodities analyzed; potential manpower cost savings more than offset increased transport costs; CONUS CIRF total pipeline requirements generally are not excessive; many network designs are virtually equivalent in cost and performance; and large user bases are naturally attractive CONUS CIRF locations. The monograph also provides commodity-specific results and recommendations.
Airplanes, Military --- Maintenance and repair. --- United States. --- Supplies and stores. --- Facilities.
Choose an application
This monograph documents the results of analyses that address the first two tasks for the F-16 and KC-135 fleets. The monograph shows how operational units can be reconfigured to support launch and recovery operations, with "heavy maintenance," such as phase inspections for fighter aircraft, being provided by an enterprise network of centralized repair facilities (CRFs). Components would also be supplied to operational units from CRFs that specialize in repairing these assets, thus removing most backshop resources from operational units. Our analyses address the costs and benefits of an enterprise approach configured to support the TF. After we presented our initial TF analysis results, we were asked to evaluate an enterprise option that would be used to support only active-duty and AFRC forces. This monograph also contains that analysis.
Airplanes, Military --- F-16 (Jet fighter plane) --- KC-135 (Tanker aircraft) --- Logistics. --- Maintenance and repair --- Management --- Evaluation. --- Costs --- United States. --- Equipment
Choose an application
"The U.S. Air Force has long struggled to incorporate new weapon system logistics requirements and support system design considerations into its broader sustainment enterprise early in the acquisition process. To help inform Air Force decisionmaking with regard to sustainment sourcing, RAND Project AIR FORCE researchers explored and adapted lessons from the transaction cost accounting literature. The result is a powerful economic-based framework that has three primary benefits when it comes to addressing sustainment planning challenges: It is a repeatable, analytically driven decision tool that does not require large amounts of data; it considers repair source decisionmaking in the context of the broader Air Force enterprise; and it is potentially applicable to other aspects of sustainment planning, such as managing government-mandated repair sourcing mixes and informing other Air Force sustainment community responsibilities. This report demonstrates how the framework can be used to select among depot maintenance strategies by applying it to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the largest acquisition program in U.S. Department of Defense history. Although the U.S. government will retain the capability to perform the range of depot-level repairs for the F-35, 40 percent of the workload -- known as "above core" -- can be considered for sourcing to an organic Air Force facility, another military service's facility, a foreign partner, or the private sector. The framework helps planners visualize program data and compare new acquisition programs with legacy Air Force systems. In this way, it offers the Air Force additional leverage in responding to technology developments and vetting contractors's engineering, reliability, and maintainability projections for new weapon systems."--Page 4 of cover.
F-35 (Military aircraft) --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Air Forces --- Maintenance and repair --- F-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Lightning II (Military aircraft) --- Lockheed Martin Joint Strike Fighter (Military aircraft) --- X-35 (Jet fighter plane) --- Airplanes, Military --- Lockheed Martin aircraft --- United States. --- Equipment --- Maintenance and repair. --- Operational readiness. --- Procurement. --- Weapons systems --- AF (Air force) --- Air Force (U.S.) --- U.S.A.F. (Air force) --- United States Air Force --- US Air Force --- USAF (Air force)
Choose an application
The ability to rapidly deploy forces into austere locations is essential to the global power projection concept of operation. Much of the materiel used by such expeditionary forces does not deploy with the unit. It is instead sourced from a global network of prepositioning storage locations to reduce the transportation requirements associated with the movement of such materiel. Current storage concepts for prepositioned materiel are based on planning assumptions from the Cold War era: that deployment scenarios and their associated support requirements could be fairly well identified in advance and the necessary materiel prepositioned at anticipated deployment sites. This monograph examines alternative approaches to storing combat support materiel to see if they would provide better support to deploying forces in an expeditionary environment that more closely resembles the current Department of Defense (DoD) planning guidance: frequent force projections, of varying sizes and of unknown durations, to wide-ranging locations.
Air bases, American. --- Logistics. --- United States. --- Operational readiness. --- Supplies and stores. --- Foreign service. --- United States --- Armed Forces
Choose an application
Intratheater airlift delivers critical and time-sensitive supplies, such as blood products for transfusions or repair parts for vehicles, to deployed forces. Traditionally, military aircraft have provided this airlift. However, for various reasons, in recent years a number of commercial carriers have provided a significant amount of airlift within U.S. Central Command. But was this more cost-effective than using organic U.S. Air Force aircraft? To explore this question, the authors collected historical (2009) U.S. Central Command data and created models to identify the most cost-effective combination of commercial and organic airlift to perform the required movements. The calculations needed to address differences in fixed and marginal costs across alternatives as well as the effects of price elasticities of demand for commercial airlift providers. Model optimization runs showed a preference for U.S. Air Force-organic aircraft but suggested that commercial alternatives should be retained to supplement Air Force aircraft for a small fraction of movements. The authors further observed that U.S. Central Command planners could have benefitted from more sophisticated decision support tools to make daily intratheater cargo-aircraft allocation decisions.
Airlift, Military --- Military & Naval Science --- Law, Politics & Government --- Military Administration --- Evaluation --- Costs --- Contracting out --- Air transport, Military --- Military airlift --- Aeronautics, Military --- Transportation, Military --- United States. --- CENTCOM --- USCENTCOM
Choose an application
The focus on efficiency in combatant command combat operations has driven peacetime logistics and sustainment processes to be more centralized in the U.S. Air Force and, in some cases, at the U.S. Department of Defense level. In some instances, the centralization placed decision authorities associated with the allocation and reallocation of resources outside the control of warfighting commands. Additionally, the move toward efficiency has created a lean supply chain that relies on assured transportation to rapidly deliver resources where needed based on demand signals from end-users. Capable adversaries, however, can disrupt the supply chain by degrading communications and limiting access to forward locations. As Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) pursues evolving operational concepts of employment designed to improve operational resiliency, questions about the fragility of the combat support (CS) enterprise persist. In light of these questions, Headquarters PACAF asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to take a holistic view of the CS enterprise, including base, theater, and global resources, and explore different concepts that could be integrated in theater sustainment plans to support operations. In this report, the authors decompose the CS enterprise from decision authority and resource characteristic perspectives and propose a framework that PACAF can use to consider the necessary elements of the CS enterprise for operating in a hybrid push-pull system as a means to mitigate uncertainty and adversary actions that challenge logistics support. The report also presents the cost of various resource buffer strategies for spare parts.
Choose an application
The U.S. Air Force (USAF) has determined that its fighter pilots do not currently have sufficient access to training ranges with airspace, threat emitters, targets, and electronic support measures capable of representing advanced potential adversaries. The USAF is developing a plan to upgrade certain ranges with these capabilities. In addition, the USAF may consider potential fighter squadron restationing options that would improve access to the upgraded training ranges. The authors developed an optimization model to determine the combinations of range upgrades and squadron restationing options that provide the highest levels of effectiveness given different policy constraints. They developed one-time move costs associated with squadron restationing and compared those with preliminary range upgrade cost estimates. Finally, the authors collected data on the risks from natural hazards and power outages for the set of bases and ranges under consideration. The authors found that range upgrades alone might not ensure sufficient access to advanced ranges and that restationing fighter squadrons can provide additional access, but the amount depends on institutional freedom to make restationing decisions. The one-time costs for restationing a fighter squadron and range modernization are on the same order of magnitude, but range upgrades may be substantially more expensive over the long term. The authors recommend that the USAF assess the effectiveness, costs, and risks of restationing presented in this report against other potential solutions for providing access to advanced ranges.
Choose an application
The U.S. Air Force is committed to the Air and Space Expeditionary Force concept and the transformation that is necessary for it to project power quickly to any region of the world. Forward positioning of heavy war reserve materiel (WRM) in optimal forward support locations (FSLs) is key to the Air Force's ability to respond to a wide variety of scenarios.
Air bases, American --- Airlift, Military --- United States. --- Supplies and stores. --- Foreign service. --- Airlift, Military.
Listing 1 - 10 of 11 | << page >> |
Sort by
|