Listing 1 - 10 of 29 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Lassen sich Lebensformen kritisieren? Lässt sich über Lebensformen sagen, sie seien gut, geglückt oder gar rational? Die politische Ordnung des liberalen Rechtsstaats versteht sich als Versuch, das gesellschaftliche Zusammenleben auf eine Weise zu gestalten, die sich zu den unterschiedlichen Lebensformen neutral bzw. "ethisch enthaltsam" verhält. Dadurch werden Fragen nach der Art und Weise, in der wir individuell oder kollektiv unser Leben führen, in den Bereich nicht weiter hinterfragbarer Präferenzen oder als unhintergehbar gedachter Identitätsfragen ausgelagert. Wie über Geschmack lässt sich über Lebensformen dann nicht mehr streiten. Rahel Jaeggi hingegen behauptet: Über Lebensformen lässt sich mit Gründen streiten. Lebensformen sind als Ensembles sozialer Praktiken auf die Lösung von Problemen gerichtet. Sie finden ihren Maßstab "in der Sache" des Problems.
Criticism (Philosophy) --- Social sciences --- Philosophy --- Lifestyles --- Philosophical anthropology --- Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- General ethics --- Social change --- Social sciences - Philosophy
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Social psychology --- Depth psychology --- Alienation (Social psychology) --- Self psychology. --- Psychology --- Alienation, Social --- Disaffection (Social psychology) --- Estrangement (Social psychology) --- Rebels (Social psychology) --- Social alienation --- Social isolation --- Self psychology
Choose an application
Philosophy, German --- Philosophy, Marxist. --- Philosophie allemande --- Philosophie marxiste --- Marx, Karl, --- Influence.
Choose an application
Come dovremmo vivere? Le odierne società capitalistiche permettono effettivamente alle nostre forme di vita di fiorire? O invece, esponendole a condizioni di dominazione e sfruttamento, cooperano ad arrestarne e inibirne i processi di sviluppo? Sono le domande di fondo a cui Rahel Jaeggi cerca di offrire una risposta in questo volume. Di contro alla neutralità etica liberale, viene rilanciato il tema della «vita offesa» e «alienata», caro alla tradizione della Scuola di Francoforte. Proseguendo e radicalizzando l’operazione critica e diagnostica intrapresa da Axel Honneth, di cui è stata allieva, Jaeggi insiste con decisione sul versante negativo: cioè sulle crisi e i problemi da cui si deve partire per sviluppare una critica delle forme di vita che risulti incisiva ed estranea a ogni paternalismo ed essenzialismo. Una posizione teorica che aggiorna il metodo della critica immanente di matrice hegeliana e, nel contempo, utilizza alcuni strumenti concettuali dell’attuale ontologia sociale per tentare di scardinare l’idea tradizionale dell’economia come qualcosa a sé stante, interpretando così il capitalismo come una forma di vita tra altre.
Political Science Public Admin. & Development --- Economics (General) --- capitalismo --- scuola di Francoforte --- critica --- ontologia sociale --- economia --- Hegel --- capitalisme --- école de Francfort --- critique --- ontologie sociale --- économie --- capitalism --- criticism --- economy --- Frankfurt School --- social ontology
Choose an application
Political philosophy. Social philosophy --- Theory of knowledge --- Kritische theorie --- Kritiek (filosofie) --- Kritik. --- Begriff. --- Basel (2006) --- Basel <2006> --- Kritische theorie. --- Kritiek (filosofie). --- Basel (2006). --- Basel <2006>. --- Philosophie. --- Philosophy --- Criticism and interpretation
Choose an application
For many liberals, the question "Do others live rightly?" feels inappropriate. Liberalism seems to demand a follow-up question: "Who am I to judge?" Peaceful coexistence, in this view, is predicated on restraint from morally evaluating our peers. But Rahel Jaeggi sees the situation differently. Criticizing is not only valid but also useful, she argues. Moral judgment is no error; the error lies in how we go about judging. One way to judge is external, based on universal standards derived from ideas about God or human nature. The other is internal, relying on standards peculiar to a given society. Both approaches have serious flaws and detractors. In On the Critique of Forms of Life, Jaeggi offers a third way, which she calls "immanent" critique. Inspired by Hegelian social philosophy and engaged with Anglo-American theorists such as John Dewey, Michael Walzer, and Alasdair MacIntyre, immanent critique begins with the recognition that ways of life are inherently normative because they assert their own goodness and rightness. They also have a consistent purpose: to solve basic social problems and advance social goods, most of which are common across cultures. Jaeggi argues that we can judge the validity of a society's moral claims by evaluating how well the society adapts to crisis--whether it is able to overcome contradictions that arise from within and continue to fulfill its purpose. Jaeggi enlivens her ideas through concrete, contemporary examples. Against both relativistic and absolutist accounts, she shows that rational social critique is possible.--
Social change --- Criticism (Philosophy) --- Social sciences --- Social history --- Social ethics --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Philosophy --- Ethics --- Social ethics. --- Philosophy. --- Moral and ethical aspects. --- Social change - Moral and ethical aspects --- Social sciences - Philosophy --- Social history - Philosophy
Listing 1 - 10 of 29 | << page >> |
Sort by
|