Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
351.81 --- 711.4 --- 711.7 --- 711.553 --- 656 --- 656.14 --- Europa --- Beleid (mobiliteit) --- Stedenbouw --- Mobiliteit --- Verkeer (planologie) --- Voetgangerszones --- Verkeer (organisatie) --- Voetgangersverkeer
Choose an application
Temperate zones --- Cold zones --- Humid zones --- Nitrogen --- Leaching --- nitrogen fertilizers --- nitrogen cycle --- Europe --- Gembloux --- Temperate zones. --- Cold zones. --- Humid zones. --- Nitrogen. --- Leaching. --- nitrogen fertilizers. --- nitrogen cycle. --- Europe.
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Over the past twenty years, National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) have moved from the periphery to the centre of the human rights debate. The potential of NHRIs to transmit and implement international norms at the domestic level, and to transfer human rights expertise to regional and global human rights fora, is increasingly recognised. In Europe, the continent with the widest variety and density of human rights protection mechanisms, NHRIs are also gradually gaining recognition as actors that can enable more comprehensive and effective human rights promotion and protection. This book, the result of a COST conference held in Leuven in April 2012, focuses on the functioning and role of NHRIs in Europe in a comparative, European and international perspective. At a time when the European Union is looking for a more coherent and strategic human rights policy, it is important that policy makers and academics pay more attention to the potential role of NHRIs. By bringing together contributions from academics and practitioners, this volume offers insights into the opportunities and challenges that accompany the increasing emergence of NHRIs in Europe and their proliferation on the multiple levels of human rights promotion and protection. Accordingly, this volume aims to inform and further trigger the NHRI debate in Europe.
Comparative law --- Human rights --- Europe --- National human rights institutions --- Human rights. --- Institutions nationales des droits de l'homme --- Droits de l'homme (Droit international) --- Human Rights --- Droit international --- Droits de l'homme (droit européen) --- 342.7 <4> --- Grondwettelijke rechten en vrijheden. Fundamentele rechten--Europa --- 342.7 <4> Grondwettelijke rechten en vrijheden. Fundamentele rechten--Europa --- 180.1 Kinderrechten - Internationaal --- Droit international. --- National human rights institutions - Europe --- Danemark --- Pologne --- Pays-Bas --- Belgique
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
Inspired by the confusion about EU defence policy in most European capitals, the premise of the study is simple: before discussing at Brussels-level what defence strategy the EU should adopt, member states should clarify what they expect individually from the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). With the possible exception of the UK, it is quite difficult to grasp what member states really want from CSDP, so any debate over a possible European grand strategy would appear to be premature. This study inverts the usual analytical approach applied to the European strategic debate. Rather than initiating the enquiry from the perspective of common interests guiding CSDP, it analyses how seven prominent member states see CSDP as a tool to pursue their strict national interests. Five researchers thus took the opportunity to immerse themselves in the foreign policy worlds of Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Warsaw, Stockholm and Madrid, looking at CSDP through national lenses – away from potentially distorting influence of the ‘Brussels-mentality’ or rhetoric. In brief, this book does not set out to analyse European defence policy as an end in itself or as a collective project, but rather as a vector of individual – indeed self-interested – visions for the member states studied. By following this rather more pragmatic path, the survey aims to identify the common denominators, misunderstandings and rigid deadlocks on the strategic debate around CSDP, with a view to enriching it.
Listing 1 - 10 of 10 |
Sort by
|