Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Administrative courts --- Administrative procedure --- Evidence (Law) --- Tribunaux administratifs --- Procédure administrative --- Preuve (Droit)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Die Studie behandelt das in der sozialrechtlichen Praxis sehr umstrittene Antragsrecht auf Anhörung eines bestimmten Arztes im sozialgerichtlichen Verfahren (§ 109 SGG). In Prozessen vor den Sozialgerichten wird häufig um komplexe medizinische Fragen gestritten. Daher wird im Rahmen der gerichtlichen Sachverhaltsaufklärung häufig ärztlicher Sachverstand beigezogen. Das Sozialgerichtsgesetz kennt neben der Gutachteneinholung von Amts wegen die Besonderheit der Anhörung eines von der Klagepartei benannten Arztes. Die Arbeit ordnet das Antragsrecht zunächst dogmatisch ein und untersucht insbesondere, welche Zwecke dieses verfolgt, und wie es sich zur gerichtlichen Sachverhaltsaufklärung verhält. Im zweiten, dem empirischen Teil wird auf Basis einer bundesweiten Untersuchung sozialgerichtlicher Verfahren der Frage nachgegangen, ob und in welcher Weise sich die von der Klagepartei veranlassten Gutachten auf den Prozessverlauf und das Prozessergebnis auswirken. Damit ist die Arbeit zugleich ein Beitrag zur Verbindung von Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtstatsachenforschung.

Medical jurisprudence --- Evidence, Expert --- Law and legislation --- Expert evidence --- Expert testimony --- Expert witness --- Expert witnesses --- Opinion evidence --- Scientific evidence (Law) --- Evidence (Law) --- Witnesses --- Forensic medicine --- Injuries (Law) --- Jurisprudence, Medical --- Legal medicine --- Forensic sciences --- Medicine --- Medical laws and legislation --- Sozialverfahrensrecht --- Sozialrecht --- Sozialgerichtliches Verfahren

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Law --- Science and law --- Evidence (Law) --- Evidence, Expert --- Biotechnology --- Droit --- Sciences et droit --- Preuve (Droit) --- Expertises --- Biotechnologie --- Philosophy --- Law and legislation --- Philosophie --- Preuve (droit) --- Science and law. --- Sciences et droit. --- Expertises. --- Biotechnologie. --- Philosophie.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This book examines the lawyer's duty of professional secrecy (also known as the attorney-client privilege) in the twenty-seven Member States of the European Union, the three Member States of the European Economic Area, and Switzerland. It provides valuable information for those working on transactions or litigations which involve several countries - they can use this book to find out to what extent any information shared with or any advice received from a lawyer is protected in each of these countries.

Confidential communications --- Communications, Confidential --- Confidential relationships --- Confidentiality --- Privileged communications (Confidential communications) --- Professional secrets --- Secrets, Professional --- Confession --- Criminal law --- Evidence (Law) --- Objections (Evidence) --- Personality (Law) --- Professional ethics --- Secrecy --- Privacy, Right of --- Lawyers --- Law and legislation --- Law --- General and Others

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Forensic Fraud is a timely work that examines the problem of forensic fraud both theoretically and empirically, assessing the relationships among examiner, workplace, evidentiary, and impact variables. Unvalidated or improper forensic science is a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In more than 50% of the DNA exonerations nationwide, unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to the underlying wrongful conviction. These problems include forensic techniques that have not been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation (such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons); testing that is improperly conducted or analysis that is not accurate (regardless of whether the forensic technique involved is validated); and forensic misconduct (such as fabricated test results and misleading testimony). Forensic Fraud is written by a forensic scientist for the forensic science community, rather than by legal scholars or practitioners, as has been the trend. Responds directly to the dramatic increase in forensic fraud related laboratory scandals and closures that have plagued the forensic science community. Offers realistic recommendations and reforms ideally suited for forensic science professionals, legal practitioners, laboratory supervisors, forensic science students and academicians.

Fraud investigation --- Criminal investigation --- Social Welfare & Social Work --- Social Sciences --- Criminology, Penology & Juvenile Delinquency --- Forensic sciences --- Forensic pathology --- Evidence, Expert --- Evidence, Criminal --- Corrupt practices. --- Crime detection --- Crime investigation --- Criminal investigations --- Detection of crime --- Investigations --- Law enforcement --- Crime scenes --- Detectives --- Suspects (Criminal investigation) --- Criminal evidence --- Criminal procedure --- Evidence (Law) --- Reasonable doubt --- Expert evidence --- Expert testimony --- Expert witness --- Expert witnesses --- Opinion evidence --- Scientific evidence (Law) --- Witnesses --- Pathology, Forensic --- Medical jurisprudence --- Pathology --- Coroners --- Medical examiners (Law) --- Criminalistics --- Forensic science --- Science --- Informers