Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Philologists aiming to reconstruct the grammar of ancient languages face the problem that the available data always underdetermine grammar, and in the case of gaps, possible mistakes, and idiosyncracies there are no native speakers to consult. The authors of this volume overcome this difficulty by adopting the methodology that a child uses in the course of language acquisition: they interpret the data they have access to in terms of Universal Grammar (more precisely, in terms of a hypothetical model of UG). Their studies, discussing syntactic and morphosyntactic questions of Older Egyptian, Coptic, Sumerian, Akkadian, Biblical Hebrew, Classical Greek, Latin, and Classical Sanskrit, demonstrate that descriptive problems which have proved unsolvable for the traditional, inductive approach can be reduced to the interaction of regular operations and constraints of UG. The proposed analyses also bear on linguistic theory. They provide crucial new data and new generalizations concerning such basic questions of generative syntax as discourse-motivated movement operations, the correlation of movement and agreement, a shift from lexical case marking to structural case marking, the licensing of structural case in infinitival constructions, the structure of coordinate phrases, possessive constructions with an external possessor, and the role of event structure in syntax. In addition to confirming or refuting certain specific hypotheses, they also provide empirical evidence of the perhaps most basic tenet of generative theory, according to which UG is part of the genetic endowment of the human species - i.e., human languages do not "develop" parallel with the development of human civilization. Some of the languages examined in this volume were spoken as much as 5000 years old, still their grammars do not differ in any relevant respect from the grammars of languages spoken today.
Grammar --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Extinct languages --- Extinct languages. --- Grammar, Comparative and general. --- Dead languages --- Languages, Extinct --- Comparative grammar --- Grammar, Philosophical --- Grammar, Universal --- Language and languages --- Philosophical grammar --- Grammar, Comparative --- Language obsolescence --- Linguistics --- Philology --- Grammaire comparée et générale --- Langues mortes --- Generative Linguistics. --- Indo-Germanic. --- Language Reconstruction.
Choose an application
The Germanic languages display cross-linguistic variation with respect to whether predicative adjectives agree. This paper attempts to determine which component of the grammar is responsible for this variation. In order to do so, it examines three different options: the variation has a lexical source, a syntactic source, or is due to an interaction between syntax and morphology. The conclusion the paper reaches is that the variation is either situated in the lexicon or has a morphosyntactic source. A purely syntactic source will, however, be excluded.
Language and languages. --- Linguistics. --- Romance languages -- Congresses. --- Germanic languages --- Romance languages --- Languages & Literatures --- Germanic Languages --- Neo-Latin languages --- Italic languages and dialects --- Teutonic languages --- Indo-European languages --- Adjective --- Grammar --- Comparative linguistics --- Generative linguistics --- Germanic linguistics --- Historical linguistics --- Romance linguistics --- Grammar, Comparative and general --- Syntax --- Morphology --- Adjektiv. --- Germanische Sprachen. --- Romanische Sprachen. --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Syntax --- Grammar, Comparative and general - Morphology --- Linguistic science --- Science of language --- Language and languages
Listing 1 - 2 of 2 |
Sort by
|