Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Long description:
Choose an application
Benedini, Giampaolo --- Bianda, Alberto --- Bottazzi, Peter --- Design Gruppo A12 --- Fronzoni, A.G. --- Gambardella, Cherubino --- Italo Lupi --- Migliore & Servetto --- Morpurgo, Valerio --- Novembre, Fabio --- Pietrra, Ugo la --- Studio Rota
Choose an application
Art --- geography --- sociology --- migration [function] --- kunstsociologie --- kunst en politiek --- Khan, Hassan --- Shibli, Ahlam --- Cnaani, Ofri --- Hari, Hariklia --- Landau, Sigalit --- Akerman, Chantal --- Poli, Filippo --- Xagoraris, Zafos --- Zanfi, Federico --- Hirschhorn, Thomas --- A12 --- Collettivo Zapruder --- Torolab --- AES
Choose an application
Art --- art [discipline] --- community art --- public art --- culturele diversiteit (kunst) --- Moti Roti --- B-l-o-c-k --- Cantor, Mircea --- Ejdrup Hansen, Elle-Mie --- Favaretto, Lara --- Haakansson, Henrik --- Haaning, Jens --- Himid, Lubaina --- Tzaig, Uri --- Milin, Robert --- Peterman, Dan --- Toguo, Barthélémy --- Heeswijk, van, Jeanne --- Closky, Claude --- Gygi, Fabrice --- Framis, Alicia --- Campement Urbain --- Gruppo A12 --- What, How & for Whom [Zagreb]
Choose an application
Birchler, Alexander ; Chabrillat, François Joseph ; Comte, Serge ; Fernández, Nicolas ; Gruppo A 12 ; Hubbard, Teresa ; Jürss, Ute Friederike ; Kaufman, Betsy ; Lämmli, Dominique ; Lamunière, Simon ; Meierhofer, Christine ; Pepperstein, Pavel ; Pocock, Philip ; Sander, Karin ; Shrigley, Gordon ; Siem, Wiebke ; Waddell, Stephen
inkjet printing --- video art --- Film --- drawing [image-making] --- Lego --- Drawing --- Painting --- photography [process] --- Iconography --- Art --- furniture making --- installations [visual works] --- art [fine art] --- Didactics of the arts --- painting [image-making] --- motion pictures [visual works] --- multi-channel video installations --- scripts [writing] --- Jürss, Ute Friederike --- Pepperstein, Pawel --- Sander, Karin --- Lämmli, Dominique --- Kaufman, Betsy --- Comte, Serge --- Shrigley, Gordon --- Lamunière, Simon --- Pocock, Philip --- Meierhofer, Christine --- Waddell, Stephen --- Chabrillat, François Joseph --- Fernández, Nicolás --- Siem, Wiebke --- Hubbard, Teresa Lynn --- Akademie Schloss Solitude --- Gruppo A12 --- Germany --- Russian Federation --- Russia --- art [discipline] --- Akademie Schloss Solitude [Stuttgart]
Choose an application
Art --- sculpture [visual works] --- outdoor sculpture --- earthworks [sculpture] --- installations [visual works] --- architecture [discipline] --- photography [process] --- ecology --- public art --- woods [plant communities] --- motion pictures [visual works] --- mixed media --- Nature --- cities --- seas --- public spaces --- graphic arts --- biological material --- fauna --- flora [plants] --- philosophy of art --- kunstmanifest --- kunstsociologie --- toekomst (kunst) --- kunst en wetenschap --- landscapes [representations] --- Starling, Simon --- Baumgarten, Lothar --- Almarcegui, Lara --- Saraceno, Tomás --- Gallaccio, Anya --- Philippe Rahm architects --- Haacke, Hans --- Fowler, Luke --- Greenfort, Tue --- Håkansson, Henrik --- Hilbertz, Wolf --- Smithson, Robert --- Heather and Ivan Morison --- Beuys, Joseph --- Ukeles, Mierle Laderman --- Fuller, Richard Buckminster --- Dion, Mark --- Denes, Agnes --- Harrison, Helen Mayer --- Harrison, Newton --- A12 --- Ant Farm --- CLUI --- Diller Scofidio + Renfro [New York, N.Y.] --- EXYZT --- R&Sie(n)
Choose an application
Bioelectric sensors are unique diagnostic principles and technologies. Although they share many traits with electrochemical sensors, especially regarding the common features of instrumentation, they are focused on the measurement of the electric properties of biorecognition elements as a reflection of cellular, biological, and biomolecular functions in a rapid, very sensitive, and often non-invasive manner. Bioelectric sensors offer a plethora of options in terms both of assay targets (molecules, cells, organs, and organisms) and methodological approaches (e.g., potentiometry, impedance spectrometry, and patch-clamp electrophysiology). Irrespective of the method of choice, “bioelectric profiling” is being rapidly established as a superior concept for a number of applications, including in vitro toxicity, signal transduction, real-time medical diagnostics, environmental risk assessment, and drug development. This Special Issue is the first that is exclusively dedicated to the advanced and emerging concepts and technologies of bioelectric sensors. Topics include, but are not restricted to, bioelectric sensors for single cell analysis, electrophysiological olfactory and volatile organic compounds sensors, impedimetric biosensors, microbial fuel cell biosensors, and implantable autonomous bioelectric micro- and nano-sensors.
Technology: general issues --- organic optoelectronic device --- pulse meter --- biosensor --- Bluetooth low energy (BLE) --- photoplethysmogram (PPG) --- chronic wounds --- electrical stimulation --- direct microcurrent --- non-invasive --- pressure ulcer --- wireless technology --- biochips --- impedance spectroscopy --- electrical equivalent circuit --- biomaterial --- Lysinibacillus sphaericus JG-A12 --- anticancer therapeutic strategies --- apoptosis --- bioelectric --- 5-fluorouracil --- HeLa cell line --- superoxide --- cell immobilization --- 3D-printed well --- bioelectric profiling --- impedance analysis --- real-time measurements --- electrochemical biosensors --- SWCNT --- point-of-care diagnostics --- label-free biosensors --- ELISA --- carbon nanotubes --- bovine serum albumin --- pacemaker --- threat modeling --- internet of things (IoT) medical devices --- vulnerabilities --- n/a
Choose an application
Bioelectric sensors are unique diagnostic principles and technologies. Although they share many traits with electrochemical sensors, especially regarding the common features of instrumentation, they are focused on the measurement of the electric properties of biorecognition elements as a reflection of cellular, biological, and biomolecular functions in a rapid, very sensitive, and often non-invasive manner. Bioelectric sensors offer a plethora of options in terms both of assay targets (molecules, cells, organs, and organisms) and methodological approaches (e.g., potentiometry, impedance spectrometry, and patch-clamp electrophysiology). Irrespective of the method of choice, “bioelectric profiling” is being rapidly established as a superior concept for a number of applications, including in vitro toxicity, signal transduction, real-time medical diagnostics, environmental risk assessment, and drug development. This Special Issue is the first that is exclusively dedicated to the advanced and emerging concepts and technologies of bioelectric sensors. Topics include, but are not restricted to, bioelectric sensors for single cell analysis, electrophysiological olfactory and volatile organic compounds sensors, impedimetric biosensors, microbial fuel cell biosensors, and implantable autonomous bioelectric micro- and nano-sensors.
organic optoelectronic device --- pulse meter --- biosensor --- Bluetooth low energy (BLE) --- photoplethysmogram (PPG) --- chronic wounds --- electrical stimulation --- direct microcurrent --- non-invasive --- pressure ulcer --- wireless technology --- biochips --- impedance spectroscopy --- electrical equivalent circuit --- biomaterial --- Lysinibacillus sphaericus JG-A12 --- anticancer therapeutic strategies --- apoptosis --- bioelectric --- 5-fluorouracil --- HeLa cell line --- superoxide --- cell immobilization --- 3D-printed well --- bioelectric profiling --- impedance analysis --- real-time measurements --- electrochemical biosensors --- SWCNT --- point-of-care diagnostics --- label-free biosensors --- ELISA --- carbon nanotubes --- bovine serum albumin --- pacemaker --- threat modeling --- internet of things (IoT) medical devices --- vulnerabilities --- n/a
Choose an application
Bioelectric sensors are unique diagnostic principles and technologies. Although they share many traits with electrochemical sensors, especially regarding the common features of instrumentation, they are focused on the measurement of the electric properties of biorecognition elements as a reflection of cellular, biological, and biomolecular functions in a rapid, very sensitive, and often non-invasive manner. Bioelectric sensors offer a plethora of options in terms both of assay targets (molecules, cells, organs, and organisms) and methodological approaches (e.g., potentiometry, impedance spectrometry, and patch-clamp electrophysiology). Irrespective of the method of choice, “bioelectric profiling” is being rapidly established as a superior concept for a number of applications, including in vitro toxicity, signal transduction, real-time medical diagnostics, environmental risk assessment, and drug development. This Special Issue is the first that is exclusively dedicated to the advanced and emerging concepts and technologies of bioelectric sensors. Topics include, but are not restricted to, bioelectric sensors for single cell analysis, electrophysiological olfactory and volatile organic compounds sensors, impedimetric biosensors, microbial fuel cell biosensors, and implantable autonomous bioelectric micro- and nano-sensors.
Technology: general issues --- organic optoelectronic device --- pulse meter --- biosensor --- Bluetooth low energy (BLE) --- photoplethysmogram (PPG) --- chronic wounds --- electrical stimulation --- direct microcurrent --- non-invasive --- pressure ulcer --- wireless technology --- biochips --- impedance spectroscopy --- electrical equivalent circuit --- biomaterial --- Lysinibacillus sphaericus JG-A12 --- anticancer therapeutic strategies --- apoptosis --- bioelectric --- 5-fluorouracil --- HeLa cell line --- superoxide --- cell immobilization --- 3D-printed well --- bioelectric profiling --- impedance analysis --- real-time measurements --- electrochemical biosensors --- SWCNT --- point-of-care diagnostics --- label-free biosensors --- ELISA --- carbon nanotubes --- bovine serum albumin --- pacemaker --- threat modeling --- internet of things (IoT) medical devices --- vulnerabilities --- organic optoelectronic device --- pulse meter --- biosensor --- Bluetooth low energy (BLE) --- photoplethysmogram (PPG) --- chronic wounds --- electrical stimulation --- direct microcurrent --- non-invasive --- pressure ulcer --- wireless technology --- biochips --- impedance spectroscopy --- electrical equivalent circuit --- biomaterial --- Lysinibacillus sphaericus JG-A12 --- anticancer therapeutic strategies --- apoptosis --- bioelectric --- 5-fluorouracil --- HeLa cell line --- superoxide --- cell immobilization --- 3D-printed well --- bioelectric profiling --- impedance analysis --- real-time measurements --- electrochemical biosensors --- SWCNT --- point-of-care diagnostics --- label-free biosensors --- ELISA --- carbon nanotubes --- bovine serum albumin --- pacemaker --- threat modeling --- internet of things (IoT) medical devices --- vulnerabilities
Choose an application
For Manifesta 3 the work by artists, artists’ collectives, urban planners and architects was spread over three main venues. For the first time, Manifesta received press coverage in the United States of America, but no less important was the high proportion of visitors from neighbouring countries in East and South-East Europe. Another brand new initiative was to give the exhibition a theme, which the curatorial team named Borderline Syndrome. Energies of Defence. In order to support the subject they were exploring they also solicited catalogue contributions not only from a wide range of Slovenian and foreign intellectuals (philosophers, historians and sociologists among others), but also from the general public. The catalogue has turned today into a collector’s item. The nature of the events in Ljubljana reflected the thriving intellectual life of the city and the relevance of interdisciplinary practice in the arts particularly, the crossover between visual art, cinema and performance, and interaction with new media.
Art --- installations [visual works] --- art [discipline] --- painting [image-making] --- boundaries --- sound [acoustics] --- video art --- performance art --- sculpting --- Starling, Simon --- Philipsz, Susan --- Paci, Adrian --- Noble, Paul --- Kiaer, Ian --- Collins, Phil --- Dabernig, Josef --- Elmgreen, Michael --- Dragset, Ingar --- Fischer, Urs --- Rasmus Knud & Søren Andreasen --- Schie 2.0 --- Abdessemed, Adel --- Bajević, Maja --- Berti, Simone --- Biemann, Ursula --- Boden, Roland --- Calovski, Yane --- Darke, Colin --- De Geuzen, A Foundation for Multi-Visual Research --- Franguouli, Nayia --- Geiger, Marcus --- Goren, Amit --- Granö, Veli --- Ivanov, Pravdoliub --- Jelavic, Ivana --- Jewesbury, Daniel --- Kamerić, Šejla --- Koo Jeong-a --- Krasiński, Edward --- Kreuh, Darij --- Lehocká, Denisa --- Melkonyan, Alexander --- Müller, Matthias --- Olshvang, Anton --- Perrone, Diego --- Raila, Artūras --- Sangar, Bülent --- Sarva, Sanna --- Savic-Gecan, Tomo --- Semper, Ene-Liis --- Span, Nika --- Stalker, Geoff --- Tabatabai, Nasrin --- Tripp, Sarah --- Tropa, Francisco --- Xhafa, Sislej --- Zbanic, Jasmila --- Zivic, Gregor --- Tuerlinckx, Joëlle --- Sala, Anri --- Pernice, Manfred --- Althamer, Paweł --- Potrč, Marjetica --- Ondàk, Roman --- Osmolovski, Anatoli --- Bule, Agnese --- Conijn, Joost --- ŠKART --- A12 --- FAT
Listing 1 - 10 of 14 | << page >> |
Sort by
|