Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Constitutional law --- Comparative law --- Droit constitutionnel --- Droit comparé --- Droit comparé --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Interpretation and construction --- Etats-Unis --- France --- Royaume-Uni --- Allemagne --- Italie --- Afrique du Sud --- Inde --- Espagne --- Hongrie --- Canada

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Public law. Constitutional law --- Comparative law --- Judgments, Foreign. --- Judge-made law --- Stare decisis --- Constitutional courts. --- Jugements étrangers --- Droit créé par le juge --- Cours constitutionnelles --- Droit comparé --- Constitutional courts --- Droit constitutionnel --- Jurisprudence --- Droit --- Interprétation --- Constitutional law. --- Stare decisis. --- Law --- Analogy (Law) --- Construction and interpretation (Law) --- Construction and interpretation of statutes --- Interpretation and construction (Law) --- Statutes --- Statutory construction --- Judicial discretion --- Judicial process --- Legal certainty --- Precedents (Law) --- Judgments --- Res judicata --- Constitutional law --- Constitutional limitations --- Constitutionalism --- Constitutions --- Limitations, Constitutional --- Public law --- Administrative law --- Interpretation and construction. --- Construction --- Interpretation and construction --- Jugements étrangers --- Droit créé par le juge --- Droit comparé --- Droit constitutionnel. --- Jurisprudence. --- Droit comparé. --- Interprétation. --- Judgments, Foreign --- Foreign judgments --- Conflict of laws --- Judicial assistance --- Courts, Constitutional --- Courts, Supreme --- Supreme courts --- Courts of special jurisdiction --- Courts of last resort --- Australie --- Canada --- Inde --- Irlande --- Israël --- Namibie --- Afrique du Sud --- Autriche --- Allemagne --- Hongrie --- Mexique --- Japon --- Roumanie --- Russie --- Taiwan --- Etats-Unis

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Juge constitutionnel --- Droit non-écrit --- Constitution --- Interprétation --- Motivation --- Constitutional courts --- Constitutional courts --- Customary law --- Customary law --- Lacunae in law --- Lacunae in law --- Judge-made law --- Judge-made law

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In 2007 the International Association of Constitutional Law established an Interest Group on 'The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges' to conduct a survey of the use of foreign precedents by Supreme and Constitutional Courts in deciding constitutional cases. Its purpose was to determine - through empirical analysis employing both quantitative and qualitative indicators - the extent to which foreign case law is cited. The survey aimed to test the reliability of studies describing and reporting instances of transjudicial communication between Courts. The research also provides useful insights into the extent to which a progressive constitutional convergence may be taking place between common law and civil law traditions. The present work includes studies by scholars from African, American, Asian, European, Latin American and Oceania countries, representing jurisdictions belonging to both common law and civil law traditions, and countries employing both centralised and decentralised systems of judicial review. The results, published here for the first time, give us the best evidence yet of the existence and limits of a transnational constitutional communication between courts

Judgments, Foreign. --- Stare decisis. --- Constitutional courts.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)