Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This study conceives of Thomas Hoccleve's Regement of Princes (1410-1413) as an essentially performative text, one that expresses its awareness of the manuscript culture in which it is so firmly rooted. The openness of manuscripts is a recurring subject in the Regement and is not only expressed through mere descriptions of, but through complex references to this manuscript context. Performances of manuscript culture manifest themselves in several aspects of the text. The first is the narrator persona, and especially the question of how persona and text are intertwined. The second is the constantly recurring interpretation of "es from authoritative sources that pervades the Regement. This urge to interpret is expressed both in the tradition of adding marginal glosses and in the process of subjecting the text to an exegetical reading. The third aspect is the relation between text and images in the Regement's manuscripts, which shows how mediality is performed and how the manuscript context is made the focus of this performance. In this monograph, all of these aspects are studied in a mindset that combines the concept of performativity with the postulations of Material Philology.

Literature, Medieval --- Manuscripts, Medieval --- Literature and society --- Political poetry, English (Middle) --- English political poetry, Middle --- Middle English political poetry --- Political poetry, English --- Political poetry, Middle English --- English poetry --- Criticism, Textual. --- History. --- History --- History and criticism. --- Hoccleve, Thomas, --- Philology. --- Material Philology. --- Performativity. --- Regement of Princes. --- Thomas Hoccleve.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This collection of essays explores medieval and early modern Troilus-texts from Chaucer to Shakespeare. The contributions show how medieval and early modern fictions of Troy use love and other emotions as a means of approaching the problem of tradition. As these texts reflect on their own traditionality, they highlight both the affective nature of temporality and the role of affect in scrutinising tradition itself. Focusing on a specific textual lineage that bridges the conventional period boundaries, the collection participates in an exchange between medievalists and early modernists that seeks to generate a dialogic encounter between the periods with the aim of further dismantling the rigid notions of chronology and periodisation that have kept medieval and early modern scholarship apart.

Love in literature. --- Emotions in literature. --- English literature --- History and criticism. --- Shakespeare, William, --- Chaucer, Geoffrey, --- Geschichte --- Liebe --- Chaucer, Geoffrey. --- Shakespeare, William --- Troilus and Criseyde (Chaucer, Geoffrey) --- Troilus and Cressida (Shakespeare, William) --- William Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida (Shakespeare, William) --- History of Troilus and Cressida (Shakespeare, William) --- Tragedie of Troylus and Cressida (Shakespeare, William) --- Troilus & Criseyde (Chaucer, Geoffrey) --- Pierpont Morgan Library (Chaucer, Geoffrey) --- Troilus and Cressida (Chaucer, Geoffrey) --- Chaucer. --- New Historicist paradigm. --- Shakespeare. --- Troilus and Criseyde. --- anticipatory emotion. --- authorial humility. --- early modern fiction. --- emotion. --- gendered female. --- hermeneutical acts. --- late medieval Troy tradition. --- literary combat. --- literary narratives. --- literary studies. --- medieval fiction. --- military combat. --- sententiousness. --- sexual frustration. --- temporality. --- tradition.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and inflation. They also report QE effects on output that are more significant, both statistically and economically, and they use more positive language in the abstract. Central bank researchers who report larger QE effects on output experience more favorable career outcomes. A survey of central banks reveals substantial involvement of bank management in research production.