TY - BOOK ID - 85736507 TI - Judging at the interface : deference to state decision-making authority in international adjudication PY - 2021 SN - 1108856802 1108867103 1108853021 1108490972 PB - Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press, DB - UniCat KW - Arbitration (International law) KW - Arbitration, International KW - International arbitration KW - International political arbitration KW - Pacific settlement of international disputes KW - International commissions of inquiry KW - Jurisdiction (International law) KW - Mediation, International KW - Judicial process. KW - Deference (Law) KW - Judicial review. KW - Review, Judicial KW - Constitutional law KW - Courts KW - Delegation of powers KW - Executive power KW - Judicial power KW - Legislation KW - Legislative power KW - Rule of law KW - Separation of powers KW - Domestic jurisdiction KW - International jurisdiction KW - Jurisdiction, Domestic KW - Jurisdiction, International KW - International courts KW - Law KW - Decision making, Judicial KW - Judicial behavior KW - Judicial decision making KW - Judges KW - Procedure (Law) KW - Interpretation and construction KW - Psychological aspects UR - https://www.unicat.be/uniCat?func=search&query=sysid:85736507 AB - This book explores how the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and investment treaty tribunals have used deference to recognise the decision making authority of States. It analyses the approaches to deference taken by these four international courts and tribunals in 1,714 decisions produced between 1924 and 2019 concerning alleged State interferences with private property. The book identifies a large number of techniques capable of achieving deference to domestic decision-making in international adjudication. It groups these techniques to identify seven distinct 'modes' of deference reflecting differently structured relationships between international adjudicators and domestic decision-makers. These differing approaches to deference are shown to hold systemic significance. They reveal the shifting nature and structure of adjudication under international law and its relationship to domestic decision making authority. ER -