TY - BOOK ID - 85527598 TI - Gender equality and public policy : measuring progress in Europe PY - 2020 SN - 1108525881 1108534481 1108530222 1108423353 9781108437462 9781108437462 9781108423359 110843746X 9781108525886 9781108534482 9781108530224 PB - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge university press, DB - UniCat KW - Sex discrimination against women KW - Women KW - Women's rights KW - Sex role KW - Gender role KW - Sex (Psychology) KW - Sex differences (Psychology) KW - Social role KW - Gender expression KW - Sexism KW - Discrimination against women KW - Subordination of women KW - Women, Discrimination against KW - Feminism KW - Sex discrimination KW - Male domination (Social structure) KW - Employment KW - Sex discrimination against women - Europe. KW - Women - Employment - Europe. KW - Women's rights - Europe. KW - Sex role - Europe. KW - Gender roles KW - Gendered role KW - Gendered roles KW - Role, Gender KW - Role, Gendered KW - Role, Sex KW - Roles, Gender KW - Roles, Gendered KW - Roles, Sex KW - Sex roles UR - https://www.unicat.be/uniCat?func=search&query=sysid:85527598 AB - "When the introduction of board gender quotas was first discussed in Italy a decade ago, those in favor of quotas relied on nonacademic results from consultancy companies claiming that a higher share of women would "lead" to substantial better performance. The arguments against gender quotas were dominated by the defense of "meritocracy", arguing that quotas contravene meritocracy because they risk promoting less qualified individuals and thus reducing the quality of board members. I was puzzled. The argument in favor was not convincing, since it was based on a simple correlation, which is different from causality. The one against was misplaced: Why do we talk about the quality of women if the quality of men has never been an issue? Moreover, since highly qualified women are abundant, why should the promotion of women reduce quality? At that time, together with some co-authors, I contributed to the production of new evidence in the political sphere, showing in a causal way (i.e., using a rigorous analysis) that the introduction of gender quotas in candidate lists increased - rather than decreased - the quality of elected politicians. The rationale for gender quotas changed: policy-makers stopped using unreliable correlations between female representation and performance to justify gender quotas and realized that gender quotas do not contravene meritocracy but rather enhance it"-- ER -