TY - BOOK ID - 143046351 TI - Assessing the value of overseas military campaigning in strategic competition AU - Watts, Stephen AU - O'Mahony, Angela AU - Habib, Maggie AU - Mills, Patrick AU - Arroyo Center. AU - Rand Corporation AU - United States. PY - 2023 PB - RAND Corporation DB - UniCat KW - Military planning KW - Armed Forces KW - Strategic planning KW - Competition, International. KW - Geopolitical Strategic Competition KW - Military Budgets and Defense Spending KW - Military Force Planning KW - Military Strategy KW - Planification militaire KW - Forces armées KW - Planification stratégique KW - Concurrence internationale. KW - Appropriations and expenditures. KW - Planning. KW - Crédits budgétaires et dépenses. KW - Planification. KW - United States KW - États-Unis UR - https://www.unicat.be/uniCat?func=search&query=sysid:143046351 AB - In strategic competition against competitors that can outspend the United States (either individually or collectively), it is important to understand not only the efficacy but also the efficiency of campaigning measures. Unfortunately, neither the efficacy nor efficiency of overseas military campaigning measures beneath the threshold of armed conflict is well understood. In this report, the authors seek to address this gap and provide the foundations of a strategic evaluation and decision-support tool to inform U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) campaign planning—more specifically, to assist in choosing overseas operations, activities, and investments in a logically linked and sequenced plan in support of specific strategy-aligned objectives. The authors break down campaigns into three sets of factors: overseas campaigning instruments (or inputs), campaigning outcomes, and contextual factors that are likely to influence the effectiveness of campaigning instruments. To uncover broad patterns among interactions between the United States and its competitors and allies and partners, the authors conducted statistical analyses on whether U.S. strategic objectives have been more or less likely to be achieved when the United States employs a given overseas campaigning tool. The authors then provide rough-order-of-magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for each overseas campaigning tool. The results suggest stark trade-offs between different U.S. strategic objectives and between the likelihood of realizing U.S. objectives and the need to operate within budget constraints. These trade-offs have important policy implications. ER -