Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper investigates the main determinants of income inequality in transition countries during the period 1990–2018. To this end, we address a major methodological challenge that lies at the core of the cross-country literature on income inequality: the potential endogeneity of income growth, which is largely ignored by most empirical studies. We adopt a two-pronged empirical strategy by (i) using trading partners’ weighted average real GDP as an instrumental variable (IV), and (ii) estimating the model via the two-stage least squares (2SLS) approach for static models and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator for dynamic models. Our empirical findings are consistent with the Kuznets curve that illustrates a nonlinear relationship between income inequality and the level of economic development. We also find that the redistributive impact of fiscal policy is statistically insignificant and taxation and government spending appear to have the opposing effects on income inequality in transition economies.
Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Fiscal Policy --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Public finance & taxation --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- Personal income --- Fiscal policy --- Expenditure --- National accounts --- Income --- Expenditures, Public --- Russian Federation
Choose an application
Spain’s structural reforms, implemented around 2012, have arguably contributed to a faster and stronger economic recovery. In particular, there is strong evidence that the 2012 labor market reforms increased wage flexibility, which helped the Spanish economy to regain competitiveness and create jobs. But the impact of these labor reforms on income inequality and social inclusion has not been analyzed much. This paper aims to shed light on this issue by employing an econometric decomposition procedure combined with the synthetic control method. The results indicate that the 2012 labor reforms have helped improve employment and income equality outcomes with no substantial impact on the overall risk of poverty. Nevertheless, the reforms appear to have induced a deterioration of average hours worked, in-work poverty, and possibly also of involuntary part-time employment.
Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Labor Economics Policies --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Labor Economics: General --- Labour --- income economics --- Labor market reforms --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- National accounts --- Manpower policy --- Economic theory --- Labor economics --- Spain
Choose an application
This paper investigates the main determinants of income inequality in transition countries during the period 1990–2018. To this end, we address a major methodological challenge that lies at the core of the cross-country literature on income inequality: the potential endogeneity of income growth, which is largely ignored by most empirical studies. We adopt a two-pronged empirical strategy by (i) using trading partners’ weighted average real GDP as an instrumental variable (IV), and (ii) estimating the model via the two-stage least squares (2SLS) approach for static models and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator for dynamic models. Our empirical findings are consistent with the Kuznets curve that illustrates a nonlinear relationship between income inequality and the level of economic development. We also find that the redistributive impact of fiscal policy is statistically insignificant and taxation and government spending appear to have the opposing effects on income inequality in transition economies.
Russian Federation --- Macroeconomics --- Public Finance --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Fiscal Policy --- National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General --- Public finance & taxation --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- Personal income --- Fiscal policy --- Expenditure --- National accounts --- Income --- Expenditures, Public
Choose an application
Spain’s structural reforms, implemented around 2012, have arguably contributed to a faster and stronger economic recovery. In particular, there is strong evidence that the 2012 labor market reforms increased wage flexibility, which helped the Spanish economy to regain competitiveness and create jobs. But the impact of these labor reforms on income inequality and social inclusion has not been analyzed much. This paper aims to shed light on this issue by employing an econometric decomposition procedure combined with the synthetic control method. The results indicate that the 2012 labor reforms have helped improve employment and income equality outcomes with no substantial impact on the overall risk of poverty. Nevertheless, the reforms appear to have induced a deterioration of average hours worked, in-work poverty, and possibly also of involuntary part-time employment.
Spain --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Labor Economics Policies --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Labor Economics: General --- Labour --- income economics --- Labor market reforms --- Income inequality --- Income distribution --- National accounts --- Manpower policy --- Economic theory --- Labor economics --- Income economics
Choose an application
Remitances are an important source of external financing in low- and middle-income countries. This paper uses the gravity model to analyze remittance flows in Russia and Caucasus and Central Asia (CCA) countries. Standard gravity determinants, such as GDP in sending and recieiving countries, bilateral distance, existence of common borders and common official language, fit remittance flows well. Remittances also react to inflation and exchange rate movements in recipient countries to sustain their purchasing power. In line with the altruism hypothesis, remittances flow to countries with higher age dependency ratio. Remittances are countercyclical and help stabilize outputs in recipient countries. However, global shocks resulting in sharp output losses of sending countries would lead to large volatility and decline of remittance inflows in recipient countries. The results of the analysis can be used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 shock on projected remittance flows into CCA.
Econometrics --- Exports and Imports --- Foreign Exchange --- Macroeconomics --- Emigration and Immigration --- Remittances --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Geographic Labor Mobility --- Immigrant Workers --- Econometric Modeling: General --- Energy: Demand and Supply --- Prices --- International Migration --- International economics --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Migration, immigration & emigration --- Gravity models --- Oil prices --- Exchange rates --- Outward remittances --- Balance of payments --- Econometric analysis --- Population and demographics --- International finance --- Econometric models --- Emigrant remittances --- Emigration and immigration --- Russian Federation
Choose an application
We study the channels that theoretically transmit the effects of inequality to economic growth, unlike much of the existing literature that focuses on the direct linkage. The role of inequality in these transmission channels is difficult to pin down and varies with the particular inequality indicator chosen. We run our analyses with six methodologically distinct inequality measures (Gini coefficients and Top10 income shares). Methodological differences within the set of Gini coefficients and the Top10 income shares exert a first-order impact on the estimated relationships, which is generally larger than the effect of switching between Gini and Top10 income shares. For a given inequality indicator, we find that the transmission channels can react in opposite directions, with the net effect on growth difficult to determine. Finally, we emphasize two additional but so far underappreciated empirical complications: (i) estimated relationships change over time; and (ii) fragile countries create significant but counterintuitive empirical associations that may obscure structural relationships.
Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions: Consumer Economics --- Health, Education and Training, Welfare, and Poverty --- Political Economy --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Measurement of Economic Growth --- Aggregate Productivity --- Cross-Country Output Convergence --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- Labour --- income economics --- Income inequality --- Personal income --- Income distribution --- Human capital --- Disposable income --- National accounts --- Income --- National income --- United States
Choose an application
Absolute poverty has dropped markedly in Bulgaria but income inequality has increased substantially in the aftermath of the GFC. This increase is due to a rise in market income inequality that was compounded by a reduction in fiscal redistribution. The redistributive role of direct taxation has declined with the introduction of a flat tax and social spending is relatively low and decreasing (as a share of GDP), is concentrated on a few social risks, and experienced a decline in its redistributive efficiency. The COVID-19 crisis is likely to deepen income inequality, increasing the room for redistributive policies.
Macroeconomics --- Poverty and Homelessness --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities --- Redistributive Effects --- Environmental Taxes and Subsidies --- National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs --- Measurement and Analysis of Poverty --- Government Policy --- Provision and Effects of Welfare Program --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General --- Poverty & precarity --- Income inequality --- Income --- Poverty --- Income distribution --- Fiscal redistribution --- National accounts --- Bulgaria
Choose an application
Absolute poverty has dropped markedly in Bulgaria but income inequality has increased substantially in the aftermath of the GFC. This increase is due to a rise in market income inequality that was compounded by a reduction in fiscal redistribution. The redistributive role of direct taxation has declined with the introduction of a flat tax and social spending is relatively low and decreasing (as a share of GDP), is concentrated on a few social risks, and experienced a decline in its redistributive efficiency. The COVID-19 crisis is likely to deepen income inequality, increasing the room for redistributive policies.
Bulgaria --- Macroeconomics --- Poverty and Homelessness --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Taxation and Subsidies: Externalities --- Redistributive Effects --- Environmental Taxes and Subsidies --- National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs --- Measurement and Analysis of Poverty --- Government Policy --- Provision and Effects of Welfare Program --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General --- Poverty & precarity --- Income inequality --- Income --- Poverty --- Income distribution --- Fiscal redistribution --- National accounts
Choose an application
Remitances are an important source of external financing in low- and middle-income countries. This paper uses the gravity model to analyze remittance flows in Russia and Caucasus and Central Asia (CCA) countries. Standard gravity determinants, such as GDP in sending and recieiving countries, bilateral distance, existence of common borders and common official language, fit remittance flows well. Remittances also react to inflation and exchange rate movements in recipient countries to sustain their purchasing power. In line with the altruism hypothesis, remittances flow to countries with higher age dependency ratio. Remittances are countercyclical and help stabilize outputs in recipient countries. However, global shocks resulting in sharp output losses of sending countries would lead to large volatility and decline of remittance inflows in recipient countries. The results of the analysis can be used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 shock on projected remittance flows into CCA.
Russian Federation --- Econometrics --- Exports and Imports --- Foreign Exchange --- Macroeconomics --- Emigration and Immigration --- Remittances --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Geographic Labor Mobility --- Immigrant Workers --- Econometric Modeling: General --- Energy: Demand and Supply --- Prices --- International Migration --- International economics --- Econometrics & economic statistics --- Currency --- Foreign exchange --- Migration, immigration & emigration --- Gravity models --- Oil prices --- Exchange rates --- Outward remittances --- Balance of payments --- Econometric analysis --- Population and demographics --- International finance --- Econometric models --- Emigrant remittances --- Emigration and immigration
Choose an application
We study the channels that theoretically transmit the effects of inequality to economic growth, unlike much of the existing literature that focuses on the direct linkage. The role of inequality in these transmission channels is difficult to pin down and varies with the particular inequality indicator chosen. We run our analyses with six methodologically distinct inequality measures (Gini coefficients and Top10 income shares). Methodological differences within the set of Gini coefficients and the Top10 income shares exert a first-order impact on the estimated relationships, which is generally larger than the effect of switching between Gini and Top10 income shares. For a given inequality indicator, we find that the transmission channels can react in opposite directions, with the net effect on growth difficult to determine. Finally, we emphasize two additional but so far underappreciated empirical complications: (i) estimated relationships change over time; and (ii) fragile countries create significant but counterintuitive empirical associations that may obscure structural relationships.
United States --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions: Consumer Economics --- Health, Education and Training, Welfare, and Poverty --- Political Economy --- Economic Development: Human Resources --- Human Development --- Income Distribution --- Migration --- Measurement of Economic Growth --- Aggregate Productivity --- Cross-Country Output Convergence --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Human Capital --- Skills --- Occupational Choice --- Labor Productivity --- Labour --- income economics --- Income inequality --- Personal income --- Income distribution --- Human capital --- Disposable income --- National accounts --- Income --- National income --- Income economics
Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|