Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Scholars in many fields increasingly find themselves caught between the academy, with its demands for rigor and objectivity, and direct engagement in social activism. Some advocate on behalf of the communities they study; others incorporate the knowledge and leadership of their informants directly into the process of knowledge production. What ethical, political, and practical tensions arise in the course of such work? In this wide-ranging and multidisciplinary volume, leading scholar-activists map the terrain on which political engagement and academic rigor meet.Contributors: Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Edmund T. Gordon, Davydd Greenwood, Joy James, Peter Nien-chu Kiang, George Lipsitz, Samuel Martínez, Jennifer Bickham Mendez, Dani Nabudere, Jessica Gordon Nembhard, Jemima Pierre, Laura Pulido, Shannon Speed, Shirley Suet-ling Tang, João Vargas

Political activists. --- Social action. --- Scholars. --- academia. --- action research. --- activism. --- activist research. --- activist scholars. --- activists. --- american studies. --- coalition. --- community action. --- education. --- ethnography. --- ethnology. --- genocide. --- grassroots. --- higher education. --- immigration. --- marginalized communities. --- minorities. --- nonfiction. --- police shootings. --- political engagement. --- political movement. --- politics. --- protest. --- public scholarship. --- race. --- racialization. --- racism. --- radical professors. --- refugees. --- research. --- social action. --- social activism. --- social justice. --- social science. --- sociology. --- urban studies.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Of all the horrors human beings perpetrate, genocide stands near the top of the list. Its toll is staggering: well over 100 million dead worldwide. Why Did They Kill? is one of the first anthropological attempts to analyze the origins of genocide. In it, Alexander Hinton focuses on the devastation that took place in Cambodia from April 1975 to January 1979 under the Khmer Rouge in order to explore why mass murder happens and what motivates perpetrators to kill. Basing his analysis on years of investigative work in Cambodia, Hinton finds parallels between the Khmer Rouge and the Nazi regimes. Policies in Cambodia resulted in the deaths of over 1.7 million of that country's 8 million inhabitants-almost a quarter of the population--who perished from starvation, overwork, illness, malnutrition, and execution. Hinton considers this violence in light of a number of dynamics, including the ways in which difference is manufactured, how identity and meaning are constructed, and how emotionally resonant forms of cultural knowledge are incorporated into genocidal ideologies.

GENOCIDE -- 327.6 --- POLITICAL ATROCITIES -- 327.6 --- CAMBODIA -- 327.6 --- Political atrocities --- Genocide --- Cambodia --- Politics and government --- 1970s. --- anthropological analysis. --- anthropologists. --- anthropology. --- cambodia. --- cambodian culture. --- cambodian genocide. --- cultural knowledge. --- cultural studies. --- death toll. --- execution. --- genocidal ideologies. --- history of violence. --- human motivation. --- human psychology. --- human rights. --- illness. --- khmer rouge. --- malnutrition. --- mass murder. --- millions dead. --- nazi regime. --- nonfiction. --- origins of genocide. --- overwork. --- perceived differences. --- political movement. --- political violence. --- social analysis. --- southeast asia. --- starvation. --- violence.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) has expanded rapidly though controversially in the United States in the last five years. The academic boycott of Israeli academic institutions is a key component of this movement. What is this boycott? Why does it make sense? And why is this an American Studies issue? In this short essential book, Sunaina Maira addresses these key questions. Boycott! situates the academic boycott in the broader history of boycotts in the United States as well as in Palestine and shows how it has evolved into a transnational social movement that has spurred profound intellectual and political shifts. It explores the movement's implications for antiracist, feminist, queer, and academic labor organizing and examines the boycott in the context of debates about Palestine, Zionism, race, rights-based politics, academic freedom, decolonization, and neoliberal capitalism.

Academic freedom --- Boycotts --- Arab-Israeli conflict --- Israel-Arab conflicts --- Israel-Palestine conflict --- Israeli-Arab conflict --- Israeli-Palestinian conflict --- Jewish-Arab relations --- Palestine-Israel conflict --- Palestine problem (1948- ) --- Palestinian-Israeli conflict --- Palestinian Arabs --- Boycott --- Consumer boycotts --- Secondary boycotts --- Consumer behavior --- Passive resistance --- Educational freedom --- Freedom, Academic --- Freedom of information --- Liberty --- Intellectual freedom --- Social aspects. --- History --- academic boycott. --- academic freedom. --- academic labor. --- academic. --- american history. --- american studies. --- antiracist. --- bds. --- boycott. --- capitalism. --- college. --- controversial. --- decolonization. --- divestment. --- feminist. --- israeli. --- key questions. --- neoliberal. --- palestine. --- political movement. --- politics. --- queer. --- race. --- racism. --- right wing politics. --- sanctions. --- social movement. --- transnational. --- united states. --- us history. --- zionism. --- International movements --- Palestine --- United States of America

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Great Han is an ethnographic study of the Han Clothing Movement, a neotraditionalist and racial nationalist movement that has emerged in China since 2001. Participants come together both online and in person in cities across China to revitalize their utopian vision of the authentic "Great Han" and corresponding "real China" through pseudotraditional ethnic dress, reinvented Confucian ritual, and anti-foreign sentiment. Analyzing the movement's ideas and practices, this book argues that the vision of a pure, perfectly ordered, ethnically homogeneous, and secure society is in fact a fantasy constructed in response to the challenging realities of the present. Yet this national imaginary is reproduced precisely through its own perpetual elusiveness. The Great Han is a pioneering analysis of Han identity, nationalism, and social movements in a rapidly changing China.

Costume --- Nationalism --- Racism --- Race --- Ethnicity --- Politics and culture --- Culture --- Culture and politics --- Ethnic identity --- Group identity --- Cultural fusion --- Multiculturalism --- Cultural pluralism --- Physical anthropology --- Bias, Racial --- Race bias --- Race prejudice --- Racial bias --- Prejudices --- Anti-racism --- Critical race theory --- Race relations --- Consciousness, National --- Identity, National --- National consciousness --- National identity --- International relations --- Patriotism --- Political science --- Autonomy and independence movements --- Internationalism --- Political messianism --- Fancy dress --- Motion pictures --- Opera --- Stage costume --- Theater --- Theatrical costume --- Decorative arts --- Clothing and dress --- History --- Political aspects --- 2000s. --- 2001. --- activism. --- anti foreign. --- chinese politics. --- cities. --- confucian ritual. --- digital space. --- digital world. --- ethics. --- ethnic dress. --- ethnographic study. --- ethnographic. --- ethnography. --- foreign sentiment. --- han clothing movement. --- nationalism. --- neotraditionalist. --- online. --- political activism. --- political movement. --- racial nationalist. --- social movements. --- social science. --- social studies. --- urban. --- utopian. --- xenophobic.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

In 2002, after an altercation between Muslim vendors and Hindu travelers at a railway station in the Indian state of Gujarat, fifty-nine Hindu pilgrims were burned to death. The ruling nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party blamed Gujarat's entire Muslim minority for the tragedy and incited fellow Hindus to exact revenge. The resulting violence left more than one thousand people dead--most of them Muslims--and tens of thousands more displaced from their homes. Parvis Ghassem-Fachandi witnessed the bloodshed up close. In Pogrom in Gujarat, he provides a riveting ethnographic account of collective violence in which the doctrine of ahimsa--or nonviolence--and the closely associated practices of vegetarianism became implicated by legitimating what they formally disavow. Ghassem-Fachandi looks at how newspapers, movies, and other media helped to fuel the pogrom. He shows how the vegetarian sensibilities of Hindus and the language of sacrifice were manipulated to provoke disgust against Muslims and mobilize the aspiring middle classes across caste and class differences in the name of Hindu nationalism. Drawing on his intimate knowledge of Gujarat's culture and politics and the close ties he shared with some of the pogrom's sympathizers, Ghassem-Fachandi offers a strikingly original interpretation of the different ways in which Hindu proponents of ahimsa became complicit in the very violence they claimed to renounce.

Muslims --- Ethnic conflict --- Pogroms --- Gujarat Riots, India, 2002. --- Mohammedans --- Moors (People) --- Moslems --- Muhammadans --- Musalmans --- Mussalmans --- Mussulmans --- Mussulmen --- Religious adherents --- Islam --- Conflict, Ethnic --- Ethnic violence --- Inter-ethnic conflict --- Interethnic conflict --- Ethnic relations --- Social conflict --- Genocide --- Jews --- Massacres --- Riots --- Godhra Train Fire, Godhra, India, 2002 --- Violence against --- Persecutions --- 2002 pogrom. --- Ahmedabad. --- Ahmedabadis. --- Bharatiya Janata Party. --- Dalit. --- Gandhi. --- Godhra incident. --- Gujarat. --- Gulbarg Society. --- Hindu nationalism. --- Hindu pilgrim. --- HinduЍuslim divide. --- ISI. --- Indian national integration. --- Jain. --- Jainism. --- Muslim communities. --- Muslim. --- Muslims. --- Naroda Patiya. --- Pakistani intelligence services. --- Rajput. --- Sandesh. --- The Times of India. --- Vaishnava traditions. --- accumulated suggestion. --- ahimsa. --- anti-Gujarati plots. --- anti-Hindu. --- anti-Muslim pogrom. --- bandh. --- butcher. --- civic order. --- collective violence. --- communal aggregation. --- cosmopolitan freedom. --- cultural processes. --- cultural unity. --- dietary habits. --- economic discipline. --- ethnic cultivation. --- heterogeneity. --- identification. --- insinuation. --- krodh. --- low-intensity tension. --- meat eater. --- meat eating. --- middle class. --- modern decadence. --- news coverage. --- nonviolence. --- phantasmagoria. --- pogrom. --- political movement. --- potency. --- power. --- pratikriya. --- psychological processes. --- relief. --- sacrifice. --- separation. --- sexual fantasies. --- state police. --- stereotypes. --- terrorism. --- tofan. --- urban experience. --- urban spaces. --- vegetarianism. --- violence. --- wage earners. --- women. --- word imagery.