Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
This paper asks whether inflation targeting improves economic performance, as measured by the behavior of inflation, output, and interest rates. We compare 7 OECD countries that adopted inflation targeting in the early 1990s to 13 that did not. After the early 1990s, performance improved along many dimensions for both targeting and nontargeting countries. In some cases, the targeters improved by more. However, these differences are explained by the fact that targeters performed worse than nontargeters before the early 1990s, and there is regression towards the mean. Once one controls for this, there is no evidence that inflation targeting improves performance.
Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Macroeconomics --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Corporate Taxation --- Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles: General (includes Measurement and Data) --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Monetary Policy --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Business Taxes and Subsidies --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Monetary economics --- Corporate & business tax --- Finance --- Inflation targeting --- Corporate income tax --- Production growth --- Short term interest rates --- Prices --- Monetary policy --- Taxes --- Production --- Financial services --- Corporations --- Taxation --- Economic theory --- Interest rates --- New Zealand
Choose an application
This paper examines the recent behavior of core inflation in the United States. We specify a simple Phillips curve based on the assumptions that inflation expectations are fully anchored at the Federal Reserve’s target, and that labor-market slack is captured by the level of shortterm unemployment. This equation explains inflation behavior since 2000, including the failure of high total unemployment since 2008 to reduce inflation greatly. The fit of our equation is especially good when we measure core inflation with the Cleveland Fed’s series on weighted median inflation. We also propose a more general Phillips curve in which core inflation depends on short-term unemployment and on expected inflation as measured by the Survey of Professional Forecasters. This specification fits U.S. inflation since 1985, including both the anchored-expectations period of the 2000s and the preceding period when expectations were determined by past levels of inflation.
Phillips curve --- Inflation (Finance) --- Unemployment --- Joblessness --- Employment (Economic theory) --- Full employment policies --- Labor supply --- Manpower policy --- Underemployment --- Econometric models. --- Effect of inflation on --- Mathematical models --- Inflation --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Forecasting --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Forecasting and Other Model Applications --- Financial Crises --- Labour --- income economics --- Economic Forecasting --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Unemployment rate --- Economic forecasting --- Prices --- Global financial crisis of 2008-2009 --- Financial crises --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
The fall in the U.S. public debt/GDP ratio from 106% in 1946 to 23% in 1974 is often attributed to high rates of economic growth. This paper examines the roles of three other factors: primary budget surpluses, surprise inflation, and pegged interest rates before the Fed-Treasury Accord of 1951. Our central result is a simulation of the path that the debt/GDP ratio would have followed with primary budget balance and without the distortions in real interest rates caused by surprise inflation and the pre-Accord peg. In this counterfactual, debt/GDP declines only to 74% in 1974, not 23% as in actual history. Moreover, the ratio starts rising again in 1980 and in 2022 it is 84%. These findings imply that, over the last 76 years, only a small amount of debt reduction has been achieved through growth rates that exceed undistorted interest rates.
Banks and Banking --- Currency crises --- Debt Management --- Debt service --- Debt --- Debts, Public --- Deflation --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Economics --- Economics: General --- Exports and Imports --- External debt --- Finance --- Financial services --- Fiscal Policy --- Fiscal policy --- Fiscal stance --- Inflation --- Informal sector --- Interest payments --- Interest rates --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- International economics --- International Lending and Debt Problems --- Macroeconomics --- National Budget, Deficit, and Debt: General --- Price Level --- Prices --- Public debt --- Public finance & taxation --- Public Finance --- Real interest rates --- Sovereign Debt --- Studies of Particular Policy Episodes
Choose an application
Many central banks target an inflation rate near two percent. This essay argues that policymakers would do better to target four percent inflation. A four percent target would ease the constraints on monetary policy arising from the zero bound on interest rates, with the result that economic downturns would be less severe. This benefit would come at minimal cost, because four percent inflation does not harm an economy significantly.
Inflation (Finance) --- Monetary policy --- Banks and Banking --- Inflation --- Money and Monetary Policy --- Monetary Policy --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects --- Banks --- Depository Institutions --- Micro Finance Institutions --- Mortgages --- Macroeconomics --- Monetary economics --- Finance --- Banking --- Inflation targeting --- Zero lower bound --- Real interest rates --- Prices --- Financial services --- Interest rates --- Banks and banking --- United States
Choose an application
This paper examines inflation dynamics in the United States since 1960, with a particular focus on the Great Recession. A puzzle emerges when Phillips curves estimated over 1960-2007 are ussed to predice inflation over 2008-2010: inflation should have fallen by more than it did. We resolve this puzzle with two modifications of the Phillips curve, both suggested by theories of costly price adjustment: we measure core inflation with the median CPI inflation rate, and we allow the slope of the Phillips curve to change with the level and vairance of inflation. We then examine the hypothesis of anchored inflation expectations. We find that expectations have been fully "shock-anchored" since the 1980s, while "level anchoring" has been gradual and partial, but significant. It is not clear whether expectations are sufficiently anchored to prevent deflation over the next few years. Finally, we show that the Great Recession provides fresh evidence against the New Keynesian Phillips curve with rational expectations.
Inflation (Finance) --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009. --- Global Economic Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Subprime Mortgage Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Financial crises --- Finance --- Natural rate of unemployment --- Econometric models. --- Inflation --- Labor --- Economic Theory --- Production and Operations Management --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Agriculture: Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis --- Prices --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General --- Macroeconomics --- Labour --- income economics --- Economic theory & philosophy --- Unemployment --- Supply shocks --- Output gap --- Labor share --- Economic theory --- Production --- Supply and demand --- Wages --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
This paper asks how well Okun’s Law fits short-run unemployment movements in the United States since 1948 and in twenty advanced economies since 1980. We find that Okun’s Law isa strong and stable relationship in most countries, one that did not change substantiallyduring the Great Recession. Accounts of breakdowns in the Law, such as the emergence of“jobless recoveries,” are flawed. We also find that the coefficient in the relationship—the effect of a one percent change in output on the unemployment rate—varies substantially across countries. This variation is partly explained by idiosyncratic features of national labormarkets, but it is not related to differences in employment protection legislation.
Unemployment --- Macroeconomics --- Recessions --- Business cycles --- Depressions --- Joblessness --- Employment (Economic theory) --- Full employment policies --- Labor supply --- Manpower policy --- Underemployment --- History --- Econometric models. --- History&delete& --- Econometric models --- E-books --- Labor --- Production and Operations Management --- Employment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Business Fluctuations --- Cycles --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Macroeconomics: Production --- Labor Contracts --- Labour --- income economics --- Unemployment rate --- Output gap --- Employment protection --- Production --- Economic theory --- United States --- Income economics
Choose an application
This paper provides an assessment of the consistency of unemployment and output forecasts. We show that, consistent with Okun’s Law, forecasts of real GDP growth and the change in unemployment are negatively correlated. The Okun coefficient—the responsiveness of unemployment to growth—from forecasts is fairly similar to that in the data for various countries. Furthermore, revisions to unemployment forecasts are negatively correlated with revisions to real GDP forecasts. These results are based on forecasts taken from Consensus Economics for nine advanced countries since 1989.
Labor laws and legislation. --- Labor market. --- Unemployment. --- Joblessness --- Employment (Economic theory) --- Full employment policies --- Labor supply --- Manpower policy --- Underemployment --- Employees --- Market, Labor --- Supply and demand for labor --- Markets --- Employment law --- Industrial relations --- Labor law --- Labor standards (Labor law) --- Work --- Working class --- Industrial laws and legislation --- Social legislation --- Supply and demand --- Legal status, laws, etc. --- Law and legislation --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Forecasting and Other Model Applications --- Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications --- Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles: Forecasting and Simulation --- Fiscal Policy --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Financial Crises --- Labour --- income economics --- Economic Forecasting --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Unemployment --- GDP forecasting --- Unemployment rate --- National accounts --- Global financial crisis of 2008-2009 --- Financial crises --- National income --- Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009 --- Germany --- Gdp forecasting --- Income economics
Choose an application
This paper analyzes the dramatic rise in U.S. inflation since 2020, which we decompose into a rise in core inflation as measured by the weighted median inflation rate and deviations of headline inflation from core. We explain the rise in core with two factors, the tightening of the labor market as captured by the ratio of job vacancies to unemployment, and the pass-through into core from past shocks to headline inflation. The headline shocks themselves are explained largely by increases in energy prices and by supply chain problems as captured by backlogs of orders for goods and services. Looking forward, we simulate the future path of inflation for alternative paths of the unemployment rate, focusing on the projections of Federal Reserve policymakers in which unemployment rises only modestly to 4.4 percent. We find that this unemployment path returns inflation to near the Fed’s target only under optimistic assumptions about both inflation expectations and the Beveridge curve relating the unemployment and vacancy rates. Under less benign assumptions about these factors, the inflation rate remains well above target unless unemployment rises by more than the Fed projects.
Ukraine --- Macroeconomics --- Economics: General --- Inflation --- Labor --- Diseases: Contagious --- Price Level --- Deflation --- Central Banks and Their Policies --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Demand and Supply of Labor: General --- Health Behavior --- Economic & financial crises & disasters --- Economics of specific sectors --- Labour --- income economics --- Infectious & contagious diseases --- Prices --- Unemployment rate --- Unemployment --- Labor markets --- COVID-19 --- Health --- Currency crises --- Informal sector --- Economics --- Labor market --- Communicable diseases --- Covid-19 --- Income economics
Choose an application
This paper examines the distributional effects of fiscal consolidation. Using episodes of fiscal consolidation for a sample of 17 OECD countries over the period 1978–2009, we find that fiscal consolidation has typically had significant distributional effects by raising inequality, decreasing wage income shares and increasing long-term unemployment. The evidence also suggests that spending-based adjustments have had, on average, larger distributional effects than tax-based adjustments.
Fiscal policy. --- Economic stabilization. --- Adjustment, Economic --- Business stabilization --- Economic adjustment --- Stabilization, Economic --- Economic policy --- Tax policy --- Taxation --- Finance, Public --- Government policy --- Labor --- Macroeconomics --- Fiscal Policy --- Incomes Policy --- Price Policy --- Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement --- Aggregate Factor Income Distribution --- Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- Labour --- income economics --- Fiscal consolidation --- Income inequality --- Personal income --- Income distribution --- Unemployment --- Fiscal policy --- National accounts --- Income --- United Kingdom --- Income economics
Choose an application
JEL Cl This study constructs a new data set on unemployment rates in Latin America and the Caribbean and then explores the determinants of unemployment. We compare different countries, finding that unemployment is influenced by the size of the rural population and that the effects of government regulations are generally weak. We also examine large, persistent increases in unemployment over time, finding that they are caused by contractions in aggregate demand. These demand contractions result from either disinflationary monetary policy or the defense of an exchange - rate peg in the face of capital flight. Our evidence supports hysteresis theories in which short - run changes in unemployment influence the natural rate.
Unemployment--Latin America--Econometric models. --- Unemployment--Econometric models. --- Caribbean Area. --- Exports and Imports --- Labor --- Taxation --- Employment --- Unemployment --- Wages --- Intergenerational Income Distribution --- Aggregate Human Capital --- Aggregate Labor Productivity --- Monetary Policy --- Open Economy Macroeconomics --- Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: General --- Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search --- International Investment --- Long-term Capital Movements --- Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies --- Demand and Supply of Labor: General --- Labour --- income economics --- International economics --- Welfare & benefit systems --- Unemployment rate --- Capital outflows --- Social security contributions --- Labor markets --- Balance of payments --- Taxes --- Capital movements --- Social security --- Labor market --- Argentina --- Unemployment. --- Income economics
Listing 1 - 10 of 12 | << page >> |
Sort by
|